ArticleEar and hearing
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Hearing Loss: Listening Ability, Social Participation and Adaptive Strategies to Challenges in the Real World.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Social-Emotional Questionnaires in Danish.Audiology research · 2025Article
- The influence of hearing loss and hearing aid use on experienced emotion in everyday listening situations.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implant Sound Processor Upgrades in Older Adults: Outcomes from a Large Australian Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Refinement and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Hearing Loss (My Hearing PREM).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the Indonesian verbal abuse questionnaire (I-VAQ) for adolescents using rasch analysis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Development of the First Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Hearing Loss in Audiology Care-My Hearing PREM.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- A Rasch analysis of the High Potential Trait Indicator: A South African sample.African journal of psychological assessment · 2023Article
- A protocol for the Hearing impairment in Adults: A Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS).PloS one · 2023Article
- Defining a Patient-Centred Core Outcome Domain Set for the Assessment of Hearing Rehabilitation With Clients and Professionals.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The feasibility of an m-health educational programme (m2Hear) to improve outcomes in first-time hearing aid users.International journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Validating the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using Rasch analysis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Development of the SWB-HL: A Scale of the Subjective Well-Being of Older Adults With Hearing Loss.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Modification and verification of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale: a psychometric analysis combining item response theory with classical test theory.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Development and Refinement of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing: A Brief Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory.American journal of audiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Evidence-Based Interventions for Adult Aural Rehabilitation: That Was Then, This Is Now.Seminars in hearing · 2019Review
- Hearing Aids Reduce Daily-Life Fatigue and Increase Social Activity: A Longitudinal Study.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe primary aim of this research was to refine and validate the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire (SPaRQ). The SPaRQ is a hearing-specific, patient-reported outcome measure that was originally developed through consultation with adults with hearing loss, clinicians, and researchers. This research comprised two studies. Study 1 aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the SPaRQ and to improve these properties by amending the questionnaire (e.g., removing items) as required. Study 2 aimed to validate the refined SPaRQ.
designIn study 1, 279 adults with hearing loss completed a long-form, 53-item SPaRQ. Rasch analysis, a modern psychometric analysis technique, was used to assess a range of psychometric properties for the questionnaire (e.g., unidimensionality, fit to the Rasch model). The properties of the individual items were also assessed (e.g., response dependency, differential item functioning). In study 2, 102 adults with hearing loss completed the refined SPaRQ. In addition, they completed three questionnaires that had been designed to measure related constructs. These were a hearing-specific questionnaire (Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly), a generic health and disability questionnaire (shortened World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0), and a brief depression and anxiety screening questionnaire (Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Traditional psychometric analysis techniques (e.g., Cronbach's alpha) were used to assess the construct validity and internal consistency of the refined SPaRQ.
resultsRasch analysis was used to refine the SPaRQ. The result was a 19-item measure divided into two subscales. The 9-item Social Behaviors subscale measured difficulties with performing actions in a social context due to hearing loss. The 10-item Social Perceptions subscale measured negative thoughts and feelings experienced in a social context due to hearing loss. Both Rasch analysis and the traditional psychometric analysis techniques demonstrated that each subscale had strong psychometric properties. In particular, each subscale passed the test of unidimensionality, displayed good fit to the Rasch model, and had high internal consistency. In addition, it was found that, as predicted, each subscale had strong, positive correlations with the hearing-specific questionnaire and moderate, positive correlations with the generic health and disability questionnaire and the depression and anxiety screening questionnaire. Taken together, these findings support the construct validity of the 19-item SPaRQ.
conclusionsThis was one of the first studies to devise a new hearing-specific outcome measure using Rasch analysis. Rasch analysis proved to be a powerful technique for supporting decisions regarding which items to retain in order to achieve a psychometrically robust questionnaire. Additional support for the robustness of this questionnaire came from the utilization of traditional psychometric analysis techniques. Therefore, this questionnaire has the potential to be used in research and clinical practice to evaluate whether auditory rehabilitation interventions improve social participation in adults with hearing loss. The next stage of this research will be to further validate this questionnaire by assessing its responsiveness in a clinical population. The combined use of modern and traditional psychometric analysis techniques should be considered in future questionnaire development and validation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.