Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29905630›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2018

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study.

Brian M Ilfeld, Rodney A Gabriel, Engy T Said, Amanda M Monahan, Jacklynn F Sztain, Wendy B Abramson, Bahareh Khatibi, John J Finneran, Pia T Jaeger, Alexandra K Schwartz and 1 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02898103 nacompletednot on this map

Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Analgesia: A Feasibility/Proof-of-Concept Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled7ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsPercutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, Sham stimulation
NCT03484429 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorHunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical CenterRan2017 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsPhantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Neuroma, Acute PainArmsPeripheral nerve stimulation, Standard Medical Therapy
NCT03738748 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of the Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation of the Multipurpose Musculature of L-3 in Non-specific Chronic Lumbar Pain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsLow Back PainArmsUltrasound- guided Percutaneous Neuromulation, TENS Therapy
NCT04670042 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) to Treat Chronic Post-surgical Pain (CPSP) Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsInjury, Nerve, Peripheral, Multiple, Chronic Post-Procedural Pain, Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsSPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System (510k Cleared)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Updates in ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventions.The British journal of radiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Latest Advances in Regional Anaesthesia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  13. Peripheral Nervous System Pain Modulation.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Pain Management: A Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian M Ilfeld
Rodney A Gabriel
Engy T Said
Amanda M MonahanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jacklynn F Sztain
Wendy B Abramson
Bahareh Khatibi
John J Finneran
Pia T Jaeger
Alexandra K SchwartzDepartment of Orthopedics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Sonya S AhmedDepartment of Orthopedics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
University of California, San Diego · USCleveland Clinic · USOutcomes Research Consortium · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPercutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an analgesic modality involving the insertion of a lead through an introducing needle followed by the delivery of electric current. This modality has been reported to treat chronic pain as well as postoperative pain the day following knee surgery. However, it remains unknown if this analgesic technique may be used in ambulatory subjects following foot procedures beginning within the recovery room immediately following surgery, and with only short series of patients reported to date, the only available data are derived from strictly observational studies. The purposes of this proof-of-concept study were to demonstrate the feasibility of using percutaneous sciatic nerve PNS to treat postoperative pain following ambulatory foot surgery in the immediate postoperative period and provide the first available data from a randomized controlled study design to provide evidence of analgesic effect.

methodsPreoperatively, an electrical lead (SPRINT; SPR Therapeutics, Inc, Cleveland, Ohio) was percutaneously inserted posterior to the sciatic nerve between the subgluteal region and bifurcation with ultrasound guidance. Following hallux valgus osteotomy, subjects received 5 minutes of either stimulation or sham in a randomized, double-masked fashion followed by a 5-minute crossover period and then continuous stimulation until lead removal on postoperative days 14 to 28.

resultsDuring the initial 5-minute treatment period, subjects randomized to stimulation (n = 4) experienced a downward trajectory in their pain over the 5 minutes of treatment, whereas those receiving sham (n = 3) reported no such change until their subsequent 5-minute stimulation crossover. During the subsequent 30 minutes of stimulation, pain scores decreased to 52% of baseline (n = 7). Three subjects (43%) used a continuous popliteal nerve block for rescue analgesia during postoperative days 0 to 3. Overall, resting and dynamic pain scores averaged less than 1 on the numeric rating scale, and opioid use averaged less than 1 tablet daily with active stimulation. One lead dislodged, 2 fractured during use, and 1 fractured during intentional withdrawal.

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates that percutaneous sciatic nerve PNS is feasible for ambulatory foot surgery and suggests that this modality provides analgesia and decreases opioid requirements following hallux valgus procedures. However, lead dislodgement and fracture are concerns. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02898103.

Indexed as

Proof of Concept StudySciatic NerveAdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHallux ValgusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID29905630
PMCPMC6092098
OpenAlexW2808371766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.