Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29905116›Full record

ReviewVisual neuroscience2018

Critical periods in amblyopia.

Takao K Hensch, Elizabeth M Quinlan

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visual neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 96 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Amblyopia: progress and promise of functional magnetic resonance imaging.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takao K HenschFM Kirby Neurobiology Center,Boston Children's Hospital,Harvard Medical School,Boston,Massachusetts.
Elizabeth M QuinlanNeuroscience and Cognitive Science Program,Department of Biology,University of Maryland,College Park,Maryland.
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Synaptic Plasticity in Young versus Aged Visual CortexR01EY016431 · NEI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Elizabeth Mary Quinlan · 2006 to 2026
$5.9M
Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI POMEROY, SCOTT LOREN · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Reversible activation on critical plasticity in visual cortexR01EY025922 · NEI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KIRKWOOD, ALFREDO, MURASE, SACHIKO · 2015 to 2024
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016431NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025922NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shift in ocular dominance (OD) of binocular neurons induced by monocular deprivation is the canonical model of synaptic plasticity confined to a postnatal critical period. Developmental constraints on this plasticity not only lend stability to the mature visual cortical circuitry but also impede the ability to recover from amblyopia beyond an early window. Advances with mouse models utilizing the power of molecular, genetic, and imaging tools are beginning to unravel the circuit, cellular, and molecular mechanisms controlling the onset and closure of the critical periods of plasticity in the primary visual cortex (V1). Emerging evidence suggests that mechanisms enabling plasticity in juveniles are not simply lost with age but rather that plasticity is actively constrained by the developmental up-regulation of molecular 'brakes'. Lifting these brakes enhances plasticity in the adult visual cortex, and can be harnessed to promote recovery from amblyopia. The reactivation of plasticity by experimental manipulations has revised the idea that robust OD plasticity is limited to early postnatal development. Here, we discuss recent insights into the neurobiology of the initiation and termination of critical periods and how our increasingly mechanistic understanding of these processes can be leveraged toward improved clinical treatment of adult amblyopia.

Indexed as

Critical Period, PsychologicalAdultAmblyopiaChildDominance, OcularHumansNeuronal PlasticityVisual CortexAcetylcholineDark exposureGABAHDACParvalbuminPerineuronal netPSD-95

Identifiers

PMID29905116
PMCPMC6047524
OpenAlexW2799533278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.