ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2018
Anterior cruciate ligament repair - past, present and future.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the impact of platelet-rich plasma injection in spinal endoscopic nucleotomy on MRI pfirrmann grading and clinical outcomes in lumbar disc herniation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Trial
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: Surgical Technique Using Augmentation With Biocomposite Scaffold.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of medial meniscal ramp lesions in patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a tertiary center.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Orthobiologics in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Histological and Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Tibial ACL Remnant: Implications for Ligament Healing.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
- Histological Changes in the Blood Vessels of Ruptured Human Anterior Cruciate Ligaments.Cureus · 2024Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Evidence-Based Concepts on Reconstruction, Repair and Future Developments.Cureus · 2024Review
- No difference in laxity, proprioception and neuromuscular control after suture-tape augmented ACL repair of acute proximal avulsions versus ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts in young, active population.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Refixation of the anterior cruciate ligament: A biomechanical analysis of suture techniques in a porcine model.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Article
- Cohort study of short-term outcomes after ACL-reconstruction using autograft with internal brace reinforcement versus isolated autograft demonstrating no significant difference.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a historical view.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair With Synthetic Augmentation and Fixation With the Knotless Suture Anchor.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Wrap It! Preventive Antimicrobial Treatment Shows No Negative Effects on Tenocytes and Tendons-A Comprehensive Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Repair of a meniscus tear within 3 weeks after trauma significantly reduces the likelihood of a recurrent tear compared with later repairs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Graft failure and revision rate after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. One-year results of a prospective case series of 155 patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Epidemiology of cruciate ligament surgery in Japan: A repeated cross-sectional study from 2014 to 2021.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article provides a detailed narrative review on the history and current concepts surrounding ligamentous repair techniques in athletic patients. In particular, we will focus on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as a case study in ligament injury and ligamentous repair techniques. PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for papers relating to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were searched by all participating authors. All relevant historical papers were included for analysis. Additional searches of the same databases were made for papers relating to biological enhancement of ligament healing. CURRENT STANDARD: The poor capacity of the ACL to heal is one of the main reasons why the current gold standard surgical treatment for an ACL injury in an athletic patient is ACL reconstruction with autograft from either the hamstrings or patella tendon. It is hypothesised that by preserving and repairing native tissues and negating the need for autograft that primary ACL repair may represent a key step change in the treatment of ACL injuries. HISTORY OF PRIMARY ACL REPAIR: The history of primary ACL repair will be discussed and the circumstances that led to the near-abandonment of primary ACL repair techniques will be reviewed. NEW PRIMARY REPAIR TECHNIQUES: There has been a recent resurgence in interest with regards to primary ACL repair. Improvements in imaging now allow for identification of tear location, with femoral-sided injuries, being more suitable for repair. We will discuss in details strategies for improving the mechanical and biological environment in order to allow primary healing to occur. In particular, we will explain mechanical supplementation such as Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation and Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilisation techniques. These are novel techniques that aim to protect the primary repair by providing a stabilising construct that connects the femur and the tibia, thus bridging the repair. BIO ENHANCED REPAIR: In addition, biological supplementation is being investigated as an adjunct and we will review the current literature with regards to bio-enhancement in the form platelet rich plasma, bio-scaffolds and stem cells. On the basis of current evidence, there appears to be a role for bio-enhancement, however, this is not yet translated into clinical practice.
conclusionsSeveral promising avenues of further research now exist in the form of mechanical and biological augmentation techniques. Further work is clearly needed but there is renewed interest and focus for primary ACL repair that may yet prove the new frontier in ligament repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.