ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2018
Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Update.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Immune Signatures in Serum Extracellular Vesicles Distinguish Food-Induced from Wheat-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy in Peanut Allergy: The Present and the Future.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- New Biomarkers in Anaphylaxis (Beyond Tryptase).Current treatment options in allergy · 2022Review
- The predominance of seafood allergy in Vietnamese adults: Results from the first population-based questionnaire survey.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: Role of Hidden Allergens and Cofactors.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate the enteropathy of food allergies in mice.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to provide an update of recent advances in the epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). RECENT
findingsFood allergy prevalence and FIA rates continue to rise, but FIA fatalities are stable. Basophil and mast cell activation tests promise more accurate identification of food triggers. Oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy can desensitize a significant portion of subjects. Epinephrine use for FIA remains sub-optimal. As the burden of food allergy continues to increase, it appears that the corresponding increase in research focused on this epidemic is beginning to bear fruit. The stable number of FIA fatalities in the face of an ongoing epidemic indicates lives have already been saved. The emergence of new diagnostic tests and interventional therapies may transform the management of FIA in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29904820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.