ArticleData in brief2018
Data highlighting the effects of spinal segmental stimulation of preganglionic sympathetic neurons on the electrophysiology of the rabbit heart.
Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional selectivity of cardiac preganglionic sympathetic neurones in the rabbit heart.International journal of cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents data highlighting the functional selectivity of cardiac preganglionic sympathetic neurons in the rabbit heart. Specifically, the data draw attention to the role of each spinal segmental outflow on cardiac electrophysiology and the influence of each segment on cardiac excitability through investigating markers of arrhythmia such as electrical restitution. This data holds importance for exploring whether the preganglionic sympathetic neurons have functionally distinct pathways to the heart and whether some spinal segmental outflows have a greater potential for arrhythmia generation than others. Discussion of the data can be found in Chauhan et al. (2018) [1].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.