Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29904646›Full record

ArticleBone reports2018

Spatial relationship between bone formation and mechanical stimulus within cortical bone: Combining 3D fluorochrome mapping and poroelastic finite element modelling.

A Carrieroa, A F Pereirab, A J Wilson, S Castagno, B Javaheri, A A Pitsillides, M Marenzana, S J Shefelbine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A Neuroskeletal Atlas: Spatial Mapping and Contextualization of Axon Subtypes Innervating the Long Bones of C3H and B6 Mice.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

A Carrieroa *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
A F Pereirab *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK.
A J WilsonDepartment of Life Science, Imperial College London, UK.
S CastagnoDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
B JavaheriDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, UK.
A A PitsillidesDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, UK.
M MarenzanaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK.
S J ShefelbineDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering and Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Imperial College London · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBCity College of New York · USNortheastern University · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20581Versus Arthritis 20581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a dynamic tissue and adapts its architecture in response to biological and mechanical factors. Here we investigate how cortical bone formation is spatially controlled by the local mechanical environment in the murine tibia axial loading model (C57BL/6). We obtained 3D locations of new bone formation by performing 'slice and view' 3D fluorochrome mapping of the entire bone and compared these sites with the regions of high fluid velocity or strain energy density estimated using a finite element model, validated with ex-vivo bone surface strain map acquired ex-vivo using digital image correlation. For the comparison, 2D maps of the average bone formation and peak mechanical stimulus on the tibial endosteal and periosteal surface across the entire cortical surface were created. Results showed that bone formed on the periosteal and endosteal surface in regions of high fluid flow. Peak strain energy density predicted only the formation of bone periosteally. Understanding how the mechanical stimuli spatially relates with regions of cortical bone formation in response to loading will eventually guide loading regime therapies to maintain or restore bone mass in specific sites in skeletal pathologies.

Indexed as

3D fluorochrome mappingBone adaptationCortical boneMouseTibia

Identifiers

PMID29904646
PMCPMC5997173
OpenAlexW2791862747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.