ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing2015
A Framework for Speech Activity Detection Using Adaptive Auditory Receptive Fields.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling auditory attention.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the hallmarks of sound processing in the brain is the ability of the nervous system to adapt to changing behavioral demands and surrounding soundscapes. It can dynamically shift sensory and cognitive resources to focus on relevant sounds. Neurophysiological studies indicate that this ability is supported by adaptively retuning the shapes of cortical spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) to enhance features of target sounds while suppressing those of task-irrelevant distractors. Because an important component of human communication is the ability of a listener to dynamically track speech in noisy environments, the solution obtained by auditory neurophysiology implies a useful adaptation strategy for speech activity detection (SAD). SAD is an important first step in a number of automated speech processing systems, and performance is often reduced in highly noisy environments. In this paper, we describe how task-driven adaptation is induced in an ensemble of neurophysiological STRFs, and show how speech-adapted STRFs reorient themselves to enhance spectro-temporal modulations of speech while suppressing those associated with a variety of nonspeech sounds. We then show how an adapted ensemble of STRFs can better detect speech in unseen noisy environments compared to an unadapted ensemble and a noise-robust baseline. Finally, we use a stimulus reconstruction task to demonstrate how the adapted STRF ensemble better captures the spectrotemporal modulations of attended speech in clean and noisy conditions. Our results suggest that a biologically plausible adaptation framework can be applied to speech processing systems to dynamically adapt feature representations for improving noise robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.