Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29904624›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2018

Profiling the Urinary Microbiota in Male Patients With Bladder Cancer in China.

Peng Wu, Guihao Zhang, Jie Zhao, Jiawei Chen, Yang Chen, Weina Huang, Jialei Zhong, Jiarong Zeng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 158 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The emerging role of the microbiome in bladder cancer: prognostic implications and treatment response.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng WuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guihao ZhangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie ZhaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiawei ChenDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weina HuangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jialei ZhongDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiarong ZengDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence indicates that microbiome plays an important role in the development and progression of cancer. The dogma that urine in healthy individuals must be sterile has been overturned. Dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome has been revealed responsible for various urological disorders, including prostate cancer. The link between chronic inflammation, microbiome and solid tumors has been established for various neoplastic diseases. However, a detailed and comprehensive analysis of urinary microenvironment of bladder cancer has not been yet reported. We performed this study to characterize the potential urinary microbial community possibly associated with bladder cancer. Mid-stream urine was collected from 31 male patients with bladder cancer and 18 non-neoplastic controls. DNA was extracted from urine pellet samples and processed for high throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V4 region using Illumina MiSeq. Sequencing reads were filtered using QIIME and clustered using UPARSE. We observed increased bacterial richness (Observed Species, Chao 1 and Ace indexes; cancer vs. control; 120.0 vs. 56.0; 134.5 vs. 68.3; and 139.6 vs. 72.9, respectively), enrichment of some bacterial genera (e.g.,

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaChinaDisease ProgressionDNA, BacterialHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStatistics, NonparametricUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkers, TumorDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sextracellular matrixinflammationmicrobiotaurinary bladder neoplasmsurinary tract

Identifiers

PMID29904624
PMCPMC5990618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.