Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29904562›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2018

STEAM: Using the Arts to Train Well-Rounded and Creative Scientists.

Verónica A Segarra, Barbara Natalizio, Cibele V Falkenberg, Stephanie Pulford, Raquell M Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bridging the gap with bacterial art.FEMS microbiology letters · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Birthing a Better Future': A mixed-methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antiracist Opportunities in theJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2021
    Article
  9. Utilizing 3D-Printing Technology in Cross-Disciplinary STEAM Education.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verónica A SegarraDepartment of Biology, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268.
Barbara NatalizioAAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow at National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22314.
Cibele V FalkenbergDepartment of Computational Modeling Sciences, R&D Platform Technology & Science, GSK, Upper Merion, PA (work developed while affiliated to Mechanical Engineering Department, Auburn University, AL 19406).
Stephanie PulfordCenter for Educational Effectiveness, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Raquell M HolmesCenter for Computational Science, Boston University, Boston, MA 02125.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the demand for a strong STEM workforce continues to grow, there are challenges that threaten our ability to recruit, train, and retain such a workforce in a way that is effective and sustainable and fosters innovation. One way in which we are meeting this challenge is through the use of the arts in the training of scientists. In this Perspectives article, we review the use of the arts in science education and its benefits in both K-12 and postsecondary education. We also review the use of STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) programs in science outreach and the development of professional scientists.

Identifiers

PMID29904562
PMCPMC5969448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.