Investigating Undergraduates' Perceptions of Science in Courses Taught Using the CREATE Strategy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom.CBE life sciences education · 2023
   Review
2. Imagining Kant's theory of scientific knowledge: philosophy and education in microbiology.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2023
   Review
3. Using Critical Analysis of Scientific Literature to Maintain an Interactive Learning Environment for In-Person and Online Course Modalities.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021
   Article
4. A Single, Narrowly Focused CREATE Primary Literature Module Evokes Gains in Genetics Students' Self-Efficacy and Understanding of the Research Process.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2020
   Article
5. A Modified CREATE Intervention Improves Student Cognitive and Affective Outcomes in an Upper-Division Genetics Course.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2020
   Article
6. Primary Literature in the Undergraduate Immunology Curriculum: Strategies, Challenges, and Opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
   Article
7. Annotated primary scientific literature: A pedagogical tool for undergraduate courses.PLoS biology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract