ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Identification of CSF biomarkers by proteomics in Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trauma-Related Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Systematic Review of an Emerging Concept.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Screening of signaling pathways and hub genes in Guillain-Barré syndrome based on bioinformatics and machine learning.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Fusion of molecular mimicry, epigenetic predisposition, and new onset GBS: a narrative review of current understanding and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Review
- CSF Diagnostics: A Potentially Valuable Tool in Neurodegenerative and Inflammatory Disorders Involving Motor Neurons: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Assessment of Expression ofFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Current Progress and Future Directions for Tau-Based Fluid Biomarker Diagnostics in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Predicting 12-month functional outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome by combining acute-phase clinical data and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome features: a retrospective machine learning study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to screen for differentially expressed proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). The identification of differentially expressed protein can provide new targets for understanding the pathogenic mechanism, early clinical diagnosis, prognosis and for measuring the effectiveness of interventions. We enrolled 50 GBS patients and 50 meningitis patients (control group) to compare protein expression in CSF. The GBS cases included 28 cases of acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and 22 cases of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). We then performed two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify the differentially expressed proteins. The expression levels were validated by ELISA, and their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in GBS diagnosis were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Three differentially expressed proteins were identified, including the upregulated haptoglobin (Hp) and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), and downregulated cystatin C. There were no significant differences between the AIDP and AMAN patients in the positive rates and quantitative expression levels of the three differentially expressed proteins. The accuracy of Hp in the diagnosis of GBS was 0.835, sensitivity was 86.7%, and specificity was 88.2%. The accuracy of cystatin C in the diagnosis of GBS was 0.827, sensitivity was 85.5%, and specificity was 89.7%. The accuracy of Hsp70 in the diagnosis of GBS was 0.841, its sensitivity was 87.8%, and its specificity was 92.3%. Hp and Hsp70 are significantly increased, and cystatin C is downregulated in CSF of GBS patients, which provides important biomarkers for early GBS diagnosis, although these proteins cannot distinguish AIDP and AMAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.