ArticleSpinal cord2018
Treatment patterns of in-patient spasticity medication use after traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Therapeutic Potential and Usage Patterns of Cannabinoids in People with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- The use of botulinum toxin for spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Nano-Engineered Cargo for Optimizing Oral Absorption of Tizanidine Nanostructured Lipid Carriers.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Article
- Botulinum toxin in preventing complications of muscle flap reconstruction in spinal cord injury/disease.Spinal cord series and cases · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Pressure Sore Surgery in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury and Spasticity.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Spasticity Management after Spinal Cord Injury: The Here and Now.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Transcutaneous spinal stimulation in patients with intrathecal baclofen pump delivery system: A preliminary safety study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The influence of neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: an observational study.Spinal cord · 2020Observational
- A Longitudinal Study of the Neurologic Safety of Acute Baclofen Use After Spinal Cord Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019Article
- Critical Care Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury-Part II: Intensive Care to Rehabilitation.Journal of neuroanaesthesiology and critical care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective cohort study using the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) and retrospective medical chart review.
objectiveTo describe treatment patterns of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) in acute and rehabilitation hospital settings in British Columbia, Canada.
settingQuaternary trauma center, rehabilitation center.
methodsIndividuals with traumatic SCI between 2005 and 2014 enrolled in the Vancouver RHSCIR site (N = 917) were eligible for inclusion. Oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use were the main outcome measures.
resultsIn 769 participants, higher neurological level and injury severity were associated with in-patient anti-spasticity medication use (p < 0.001 for both). Of individuals with cervical and thoracic injuries (n = 589), 37% were prescribed anti-spasticity medication during hospital admission. Baclofen was the most commonly used first line oral therapy. Mean (SD) and median time from injury to Baclofen initiation was 70 (69) and 50 days, respectively. The probability of having initiated an in-patient anti-spasticity medication was 55% (95% CI (49, 60)) for individuals 6 months post-injury, and 71% (95% CI (62, 79)) for individuals 12 months post-injury. At community discharge, the prevalence of oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use was 26 and 5%. Practice patterns of anti-spasticity medication use (2005-2009 vs. 2010-2014) have not changed significantly over time.
conclusionsThis is the first large prospective cohort study of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic SCI. Results from our study inform clinicians and individuals of "real world" anti-spasticity medication use among individuals with traumatic SCI and may help guide care for this population in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29904191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.