ArticleNature communications2018
Quantification and modeling of mechanical degradation in lithium-ion batteries based on nanoscale imaging.
Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversion-Type Anodes: Challenges, Mitigation Strategies, and Evaluation Guidelines.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Taming Transport Gradients: Engineered Microstructures for Fast-Charging Thick Electrodes.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Quantifying the Evolution of Binder/Active Material Interface Fracture Properties from the As-Prepared State to Cycling Conditions.ACS applied energy materials · 2025Article
- An in-situ polymerization strategy for gel polymer electrolyte Si||Ni-rich lithium-ion batteries.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Application of neutron imaging in observing various states of matter inside lithium batteries.National science review · 2023Review
- Deep learning-based segmentation of lithium-ion battery microstructures enhanced by artificially generated electrodes.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Multi-scale quantification and modeling of aged nanostructured silicon-based composite anodes.Communications chemistry · 2020Article
- Machine-learning-revealed statistics of the particle-carbon/binder detachment in lithium-ion battery cathodes.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Systems-level investigation of aqueous batteries for understanding the benefit of water-in-salt electrolyte by synchrotron nanoimaging.Science advances · 2020Article
- Focus characterization of the NanoMAX Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2019Article
- Three-dimensional alteration of neurites in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capacity fade in lithium-ion battery electrodes can result from a degradation mechanism in which the carbon black-binder network detaches from the active material. Here we present two approaches to visualize and quantify this detachment and use the experimental results to develop and validate a model that considers how the active particle size, the viscoelastic parameters of the composite electrode, the adhesion between the active particle and the carbon black-binder domain, and the solid electrolyte interphase growth rate impact detachment and capacity fade. Using carbon-silicon composite electrodes as a model system, we demonstrate X-ray nano-tomography and backscatter scanning electron microscopy with sufficient resolution and contrast to segment the pore space, active particles, and carbon black-binder domain and quantify delamination as a function of cycle number. The validated model is further used to discuss how detachment and capacity fade in high-capacity materials can be minimized through materials engineering.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.