Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29904123›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction.

Charlotte L Rae, Vanessa E Botan, Cassandra D Gould van Praag, Aleksandra M Herman, Jasmina A K Nyyssönen, David R Watson, Theodora Duka, Sarah N Garfinkel, Hugo D Critchley

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Body as First Teacher: The Role of Rhythmic Visceral Dynamics in Early Cognitive Development.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  11. Arousal may not be anything to get excited about.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte L RaeSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK. c.rae@bsms.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-4971
Vanessa E BotanSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Cassandra D Gould van PraagSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-4637
Aleksandra M HermanSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3338-0543
Jasmina A K NyyssönenSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
David R WatsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
Theodora DukaSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9081-6457
Sarah N GarfinkelSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5961-1012
Hugo D CritchleySackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-9284

Funding

European Research Council 324150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate control of motor impulsivity. Participants performed a stop signal task, in which stop cues were delivered at different time points within the cardiac cycle: at systole when the heart contracts (T-wave peak, approximately 300 ms following the R-wave), or at diastole between heartbeats (R-wave peak). Response inhibition was better at systole, indexed by a shorter stop signal reaction time (SSRT), and longer stop signal delay (SSD). Furthermore, parasympathetic control of cardiovascular tone, and subjective sensitivity to interoceptive states, predicted response inhibition efficiency, although these cardiovascular and interoceptive correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. This suggests that response inhibition capacity is influenced by interoceptive physiological cues, such that people are more likely to express impulsive actions during putative states of lower cardiovascular arousal, when frequency and strength of cardiac afferent signalling is reduced.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArousalDiastoleFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSystole

Identifiers

PMID29904123
PMCPMC6002409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.