Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29904073›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Sample tracking in microbiome community profiling assays using synthetic 16S rRNA gene spike-in controls.

Dieter M Tourlousse, Akiko Ohashi, Yuji Sekiguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dieter M TourlousseBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan. dieter.tourlousse@aist.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5177-5215
Akiko OhashiBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yuji SekiguchiBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workflows for microbiome community profiling by high-throughput sequencing are prone to sample mix-ups and cross-contamination due to the complexity of the procedures and large number of samples typically analyzed in parallel. We employed synthetic 16S rRNA gene spike-in controls to establish a method for tracking of sample identity and detection of cross-contamination in microbiome community profiling assays based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (16S-seq). Results demonstrated that combinatorial sample tracking mixes (STMs) can be reliably resolved by Illumina sequencing and faithfully represent their sample of origin. In a single-blinded experiment, addition of STMs at low levels was shown to be sufficient to unambiguously identify and resolve swapped samples. Using artificial admixtures of individually SMT-tagged samples, we further established the ability to detect and quantify cross-contamination down to a level of approximately 1%. The utility of our technique was underscored through detection of an unplanned case of cross-contamination that occurred during this study. By enabling detection of sample mix-ups and cross-contamination throughout 16S-seq workflows, the present technique thus assures provenance of sequence data on a per-sample basis. The method can be readily implemented in standard 16S-seq workflows and its routine application is expected to enhance the reliability of 16S-seq data.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaReference StandardsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29904073
PMCPMC6002373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.