ArticleScientific reports2018
Sample tracking in microbiome community profiling assays using synthetic 16S rRNA gene spike-in controls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytic attributes of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing methodology for human gut microbiota characterization.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Evaluating preservation effects on honeybee gut microbiota inocula.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Smoking-induced microbial dysbiosis: a key driver of systemic diseases and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Targeting the 16S rRNA Gene by Reverse Complement PCR Next-Generation Sequencing: Specific and Sensitive Detection and Identification of Microbes Directly in Clinical Samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Absolute quantification of viable bacteria abundances in food by next-generation sequencing: Quantitative NGS of viable microbes.Current research in food science · 2023Article
- Article
- A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling.MicrobiologyOpen · 2020Article
- Effects of Low and High FODMAP Diets on Human Gastrointestinal Microbiota Composition in Adults with Intestinal Diseases: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workflows for microbiome community profiling by high-throughput sequencing are prone to sample mix-ups and cross-contamination due to the complexity of the procedures and large number of samples typically analyzed in parallel. We employed synthetic 16S rRNA gene spike-in controls to establish a method for tracking of sample identity and detection of cross-contamination in microbiome community profiling assays based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (16S-seq). Results demonstrated that combinatorial sample tracking mixes (STMs) can be reliably resolved by Illumina sequencing and faithfully represent their sample of origin. In a single-blinded experiment, addition of STMs at low levels was shown to be sufficient to unambiguously identify and resolve swapped samples. Using artificial admixtures of individually SMT-tagged samples, we further established the ability to detect and quantify cross-contamination down to a level of approximately 1%. The utility of our technique was underscored through detection of an unplanned case of cross-contamination that occurred during this study. By enabling detection of sample mix-ups and cross-contamination throughout 16S-seq workflows, the present technique thus assures provenance of sequence data on a per-sample basis. The method can be readily implemented in standard 16S-seq workflows and its routine application is expected to enhance the reliability of 16S-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.