Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29903995›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Big Sound and Extreme Fungi-Xerophilic, Halotolerant Aspergilli and Penicillia with Low Optimal Temperature as Invaders of Historic Pipe Organs.

Katja Sterflinger, Christian Voitl, Ksenija Lopandic, Guadalupe Piñar, Hakim Tafer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katja SterflingerVIBT-Extremophile Center, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Katja.Sterflinger@boku.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-0296-6728
Christian VoitlVIBT-Extremophile Center, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. christian.voitl@boku.ac.at.
Ksenija LopandicVIBT-Extremophile Center, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Ksenija.lopandic@boku.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2674-2849
Guadalupe PiñarVIBT-Extremophile Center, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. guadalupe.pinar@boku.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-7881-8572
Hakim TaferVIBT-Extremophile Center, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. hakim.tafer@boku.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent investigations have shown that xerophilic fungi may pose a biodeterioration risk by threatening objects of cultural heritage including many types of materials, including wood, paint layers, organic glues or leather and even metal. Historic—and also new built—pipe organs combine all those materials. In this study, halotolerant aspergilli and penicillia with low optimal temperatures were shown to be the most frequent invaders of pipe organs. The fungi form white mycelia on the organic components of the organs with a clear preference for the bolus paint of the wooden pipes, the leather-made hinges of the stop actions and all parts fixed by organic glue. Physiological tests showed that the strains isolated from the instruments all show a halotolerant behavior, although none was halophilic. The optimum growth temperature is below 20 °C, thus the fungi are perfectly adapted to the cool and relatively dry conditions in the churches and organs respectively. The

Indexed as

biodeteriorationpipe organsxerophilic fungi

Identifiers

PMID29903995
PMCPMC6027336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.