Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29903926›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Zonally Magnified Oblique Multislice and Non-Zonally Magnified Oblique Multislice DWI of the Cervical Spinal Cord.

M Alizadeh, M M Poplawski, J Fisher, R J T Gorniak, A Dresner, F B Mohamed, A E Flanders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The apparent diffusion coefficient based on small-field DWI is superior to T2-weighted imaging in evaluating neurological dysfunction of degenerative cervical myelopathy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M AlizadehFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0003-1923-0407
M M PoplawskiFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-558X
J FisherFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-4630
R J T GorniakFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0003-2289-9064
A DresnerFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-6012
F B MohamedFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-0612
A E FlandersFrom the Department of Radiology (M.A., M.M.P., J.F., R.J.T.G., A.D., F.B.M., A.E.F.), Jefferson Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center Adam.Flanders@jefferson.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-0787
Fondazione Studio Marangoni · ITImaging Center · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe zonally magnified oblique multislice EPI (ZOOM-EPI) diffusion-weighted sequence has been visually shown to provide superior MR diffusion image quality compared with the full-FOV single-shot EPI sequence (non-ZOOM-EPI) in the adult cervical spinal cord. The purpose of this study was to examine the diffusion tensor imaging indices in the normal human cervical spinal cord between ZOOMED and non-ZOOMED DTI acquisitions and determine whether DTI values are comparable between direct and indirect age-matched groups. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-four subjects 23-58 years of age (9 direct age-matched and 45 indirect age-matched) were scanned using a 1.5T scanner. Diffusion tensor indices including fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity were generated from the DTI dataset. These DTI values were calculated for both ZOOM and non-ZOOM acquisitions and compared at each intervertebral disc level. The variability of the DTI values for ZOOM and non-ZOOM sequences was measured using a coefficient of variation within direct and indirect age-matched controls.

resultsThe mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity values obtained along the cervical spinal cord in the age-matched controls showed a significant decrease using the ZOOM sequence (

conclusionsZOOM DTI acquisition methods provide superior image quality and precision over non-ZOOM techniques and are recommended over conventional full-FOV single-shot EPI DTI for clinical applications in cervical spinal cord imaging.

Indexed as

AdultCervical CordDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29903926
PMCPMC7410564
OpenAlexW2808672185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.