Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29903922›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Contextual Radiology Reporting: A New Approach to Neuroradiology Structured Templates.

M D Mamlouk, P C Chang, R R Saket

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Aortic Injury and Hemopericardium: Key Findings and Evaluation.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. American College of Veterinary Radiology and European College of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging consensus statement on imaging report foundations.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M D MamloukFrom the Department of Radiology (M.D.M., R.R.S.), The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Santa Clara, Santa Clara, California mark.d.mamlouk@kp.org mark.mamlouk@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-8912
P C ChangDepartment of Radiology (P.C.C.), The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center South San Francisco, South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-6863
R R SaketFrom the Department of Radiology (M.D.M., R.R.S.), The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Santa Clara, Santa Clara, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1776-6291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured reporting has many advantages over conventional narrative reporting and has been advocated for standard usage by radiologic societies and literature. Traditional structured reports though are often not tailored to the appropriate clinical situation, are generic, and can be overly constraining. Contextual reporting is an alternative method of structured reporting that is specifically related to the disease or examination indication. Herein, we create a library of 50 contextual structured reports for neuroradiologists and emphasize their clinical value over noncontextual structured reporting. These templates are located in the On-line Appendix, and a downloadable PowerScribe 360 file may be accessed at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AlPUmfAXPzjkMFcHf7vGKF4Q-vIdpflT.

Indexed as

HumansNeurologyRadiologyRadiology Information SystemsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID29903922
PMCPMC7410548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.