Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29903800›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Perceptions of overdetection of breast cancer among women 70 years of age and older in the USA: a mixed-methods analysis.

Monique R Pappadis, Robert J Volk, Shilpa Krishnan, Susan C Weller, Elizabeth Jaramillo, Diana Stewart Hoover, Sharon H Giordano, Alai Tan, Kristin M Sheffield, Ashley J Housten and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Women's experiences of age-related discontinuation from mammography screening: A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Authors' response.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Women's Acceptance of Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Can We Assess Harm-Benefit Tradeoffs?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Monique R PappadisDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-4380
Robert J VolkDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shilpa KrishnanDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Susan C WellerSealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth JaramilloSealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Diana Stewart HooverDepartment of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sharon H GiordanoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alai TanCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kristin M SheffieldGlobal Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ashley J HoustenDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7379-0678
James S GoodwinSealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
R25 SUPPLEMENT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY EDUCATIONR25CA057730 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, SHINE · 1992 to 2016
$18.6M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention & ControlK05CA134923 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2008 to 2019
$1.0M
Health Literacy and Smoking Cessation in Low-SES, Diverse SmokersK23DA040933 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HOOVER, DIANA STEWART · 2016 to 2018
$500k
Breast Cancer Screening: Priorities and Attitudes of Diverse Women Under 50K99MD011485 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HOUSTEN, ASHLEY · 2017 to 2018
$177k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134NCI NIH HHS K05 CA134923NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057730NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA040933NIMHD NIH HHS K99 MD011485NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD009326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent research on the perceptions of overdiagnosis or overdetection of breast cancer has largely been conducted outside of the USA and with women younger than 70 years.Therefore, we explored older women's perceptions about the concept of overdetection of breast cancer and its influence on future screening intentions.

designMixed-methods analysis using purposive sampling based on race/ethnicity, age and educational level. Semistructured interviews, including two hypothetical scenarios illustrating benefits and harms of screening and overdetection, were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic approaches. An inferential clustering technique was used to assess overall patterns in narrative content by sociodemographic characteristics, personal screening preferences or understanding of overdetection.

settingHouston/Galveston, Texas, USA.

participants59 English-speaking women aged 70 years and older with no prior history of breast cancer.

resultsVery few women were familiar with the concept of overdetection and overtreatment. After the scenarios were presented, half of the women still demonstrated a lack of understanding of the concept of overdetection. Many women expressed suspicion of the concept, equating it to rationing. Women who showed understanding of overdetection were more likely to express an intent to discontinue screening, although 86% of the women stated that hearing about overdetection did not influence their screening decision. Themes identified did not differ by race/ethnicity, education, age or screening preferences. Differences were identified between women who understood overdetection and women who did not (

conclusionsMany older women did not understand the concept of overdetection, in addition to being suspicious of or resistant to the concept. Providing older women with descriptions of overdetection may not be sufficient to influence screening intentions.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMammographyMedical OveruseAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionTexasdecision makingearly detection of cancermammography screeningpreventative medicinequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID29903800
PMCPMC6009543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.