ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018
Sharing and Empathy in Digital Spaces: Qualitative Study of Online Health Forums for Breast Cancer and Motor Neuron Disease (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis).
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Cancer Online Support Groups Work, for Whom, and in What Circumstances: Realist Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- From empathy to creative output: exploring the emotional-cognitive mechanisms of digital creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Women's Insights on Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: Qualitative Online Forums Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Linguistic Signals on Cognitive Change in Support Seekers in Online Mental Health Communities: Text Analysis and Empirical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Toxic Relationships Described by People With Breast Cancer on Reddit: Topic Modeling Study.JMIR cancer · 2024Article
- Enhancing ALS disease management: exploring integrated user value through online communities evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Online peer support for people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): a narrative synthesis systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Self-help management of patients undergoing chemotherapy: analysis of the online forum of the women's self-help association against cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Configuration Path Study of Influencing Factors on Health Information-Sharing Behavior among Users of Online Health Communities: Based on SEM and fsQCA Methods.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Use of Online Health Forums by People Living With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Positive aspects of caregiving among informal caregivers of persons with dementia in the Asian context: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Midwife empathy and its association with the childbirth experience: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Use of the Internet for Health Purposes-A National Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey among Adults in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Weaving a new blanket together: lessons on compassionate leadership and engagement from a virtual regional summit on early childhood wellness in northern communities of British Columbia, Canada.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Online Peer Support for People With Parkinson Disease: Narrative Synthesis Systematic Review.JMIR aging · 2022Review
- Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review.JMIR mental health · 2022Review
- Mirroring, monitoring, modelling, belonging, and distancing: Psychosocial processes in an online support group of breast cancer patients.Journal of community psychology · 2022Article
- Longitudinal Changes of COVID-19 Symptoms in Social Media: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Observational
- Long Covid - The illness narratives.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
- Insaka: mobile phone support groups for adolescent pregnant women living with HIV.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe availability of an increasing number of online health forums has altered the experience of living with a health condition, as more people are now able to connect and support one another. Empathy is an important component of peer-to-peer support, although little is known about how empathy develops and operates within online health forums.
objectiveThe aim of this paper is to explore how empathy develops and operates within two online health forums for differing health conditions: breast cancer and motor neuron disease (MND), also known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
methodsThis qualitative study analyzed data from two sources: interviews with forum users and downloaded forum posts. Data were collected from two online health forums provided by UK charities: Breast Cancer Care and the Motor Neurone Disease Association. We analyzed 84 threads from the breast cancer forum and 52 from the MND forum. Threads were purposively sampled to reflect varied experiences (eg, illness stages, topics of conversation, and user characteristics). Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 Breast Cancer Care forum users and five users of the MND forum. All datasets were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach and combined to triangulate the analysis.
resultsWe found that empathy develops and operates through shared experiences and connections. The development of empathy begins outside the forum with experiences of illness onset and diagnosis, creating emotional and informational needs. Users came to the forum and found their experiences and needs were shared and understood by others, setting the empathetic tone and supportive ethos of the forum. The forum was viewed as both a useful and meaningful space in which they could share experiences, information, and emotions, and receive empathetic support within a supportive and warm atmosphere. Empathy operated through connections formed within this humane space based on similarity, relationships, and shared feelings. Users felt a need to connect to users who they felt were like themselves (eg, people sharing the same specific diagnosis). They formed relationships with other users. They connected based on the emotional understanding of ill health. Within these connections, empathic communication flourished.
conclusionsEmpathy develops and operates within shared experiences and connections, enabled by structural possibilities provided by the forums giving users the opportunity and means to interact within public, restricted, and more private spaces, as well as within groups and in one-to-one exchanges. The atmosphere and feeling of both sites and perceived audiences were important facilitators of empathy, with users sharing a perception of virtual communities of caring and supportive people. Our findings are of value to organizations hosting health forums and to health professionals signposting patients to additional sources of support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.