ReviewBrain research2018
Engineering a second brain in a dish.
Review in Brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gut brain in a dish: Murine primary enteric nervous system cell cultures.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Review
- Chronic Abdominal Pain in IBD Research Initiative: Unraveling Biological Mechanisms and Patient Heterogeneity to Personalize Treatment and Improve Clinical Outcomes.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2021Article
- Ethical issues related to brain organoid research.Brain research · 2020Review
- Gastrointestinal tract modeling using organoids engineered with cellular and microbiota niches.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The utilization of human pluripotent stem cells holds great promise in elucidating principles of developmental biology and applications in personalized and regenerative medicine. Breakthroughs from the last decade have allowed the scientific community to better understand and successfully manipulate human pluripotent stem cells using distinct differentiation strategies into a variety of target tissues. This manipulation relies solely on our understanding of developmental processes occurring in model organisms. The in vitro translation of our developmental knowledge upon stem cells provides a new means to generate specific tissue to understand developmental and disease mechanisms, as well as physiological processes. The generation of an integrated human intestinal tissue is one such example. In this review, we highlight the biological motivation behind the generation of human intestinal organoids. We further describe the integration of an enteric nervous system within the organoid to generate a functional intestine. Forthcoming strategies to add additional complexities to the intestinal tissue so as to better understand how our "second brain" functions within the gut are also discussed. The organoid system offers a promising avenue to understand how the enteric nervous system works and patterns the human intestine during both physiology and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.