Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902990›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

HIV-related stigma and discrimination amongst healthcare providers in Guangzhou, China.

Xiaomei Dong, Jianwei Yang, Lin Peng, Minhui Pang, Jiayi Zhang, Zhan Zhang, Jiaming Rao, Haiqing Wang, Xiongfei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaomei DongDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianwei YangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin PengDongguan Municipal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China.
Minhui PangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayi ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhan ZhangDepartment of Medical Statistics, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaming RaoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Haiqing WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiongfei ChenGuangzhou Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 11742513@qq.com.

Funding

Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China A2013336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV-related discrimination amongst healthcare providers is one of the strongest obstacles to effectively responding to HIV. This study was conducted to explore the occurrence of and other factors related to discrimination against people living with HIV/AIDS amongst healthcare providers in Guangzhou, China.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study, conducted between July and October 2016, that enrolled healthcare providers from 9 healthcare institutions in Guangzhou, China. HIV-related discrimination was assessed using anonymous self-designed questionnaires. Chi-square tests were used to study the differences in the socio-demographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, HIV-related knowledge and personal attitudes between participants who had and had not discriminated against People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the factors associated with HIV-related discrimination.

resultsA total of 972 healthcare providers were investigated, and 386 (39.7%) had previously served HIV-positive individuals in their work. Administering HIV antibody tests for patients without his or her consent was the most frequent act of discrimination (65.3%), and other forms of discrimination, including "differential treatment" (51.0%), "disclosed information" (46.4%) and "refused to treat" (38.6%), were also prevalent. The logistic regression analysis indicated that people who had worked for 3-7 years, worked in secondary hospitals or lower, worked in surgical departments, had lower scores on HIV transmission knowledge, were dissatisfied with the occupational exposure protection system offered by the government, were worried about HIV-related exposure and feared HIV-related exposure were more likely to commit an act of medical discrimination against PLWHA.

conclusionHIV-related discrimination was not unusual in the healthcare providers of Guangzhou, which may be related to their negative cognitions and attitudes as well as the hospital management system and government policy. Therefore, comprehensive HIV-related knowledge education should be implemented to change the attitude of healthcare providers. In addition, the current laws and regulations should be refined by the government to protect the rights of healthcare providers. The contradiction between designated hospitals and non-designated hospitals should be resolved to ensure that PLWHA receive timely and effective help and treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsPrejudiceStereotypingChinaChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare providersHIV/AIDSStigma and discrimination

Identifiers

PMID29902990
PMCPMC6003171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.