Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902647›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2019

Analysis of Fecal Primary Bile Acids Detects Increased Stool Weight and Colonic Transit in Patients With Chronic Functional Diarrhea.

Priya Vijayvargiya, Michael Camilleri, Victor Chedid, Paula Carlson, Irene Busciglio, Duane Burton, Leslie J Donato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A single test strategy using spot fecal bile acid test may be a feasible strategy for the diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gut microbiome - the key to our pets' health and happiness?Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  10. [Bile Acid Diarrhea].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. New Developments in Bile Acid Diarrhea.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bile Acid Diarrhea in Adults and Adolescents.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priya VijayvargiyaClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael CamilleriClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: camilleri.michael@mayo.edu.
Victor ChedidClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Paula CarlsonClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Irene BusciglioClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Duane BurtonClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Leslie J DonatoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Genetic Control and Ileo-Colonic Mucosal Expression of Bile Acid-Related Mechanisms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome-DiarrheaR01DK115950 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L. · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
Bile Acids, Genetic Control and Colonic Function in Irritable Bowel SyndromeR01DK092179 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092179NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsPatients with bile acid diarrhea (BAD) are identified based on increased levels of BAs in fecal samples collected over a 48-hr period while on a 100-gram fat diet (48-hr BA), retention of

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 64 patients with IBS-D, 30 patients with IBS-constipation, 30 healthy volunteers (controls). We collected data on fecal weights (measured over a 48-hr period), colonic transit over a 24-hr period (measured by scintigraphy), and percentages of different BAs in stool samples. Colonic transit was measured as the geometric center (weighted average) of colonic counts on a scale of 1 (100% in ascending colon) to 5 (100% in stool). We performed area under the curve (AUC) analyses to assess the association between result of serum and stool tests and high fecal weight (>400g/48 hrs) or rapid colonic transit (>3.34, corresponding to isotope geometric center in sigmoid colon). We estimated the prevalence of increased 48-hr fecal BAs among 938 patients with chronic diarrhea.

resultsTotal fecal 48-hr BA alone, or in combination with percentage of primary fecal BAs, identified patients with increased fecal weight with an AUROC of 0.86. Percentage of primary fecal BA alone identified patients with increased fecal weight with an AUROC of 0.73. Total fecal 48-hr BA alone identified patients with increased colonic transit with an AUROC of 0.65 and percentage of primary fecal BA alone identified patients with increased colonic transit with an AUROC of 0.69; combined data on these features identified patients with increased colonic transit with an AUROC of 0.70. Serum level of C4 identified patients with increased colonic transit with an AUROC of 0.60. Primary BAs >10% identified patients with increased fecal weight (sensitivity 49% and specificity 91%) and rapid colonic transit (sensitivity 48% and specificity 87%). Among the patients with chronic diarrhea, 45.6% had fecal primary BAs >10% and 27% had increased total fecal BAs (>2337 μmol/48 hrs).

conclusionsIn a retrospective analysis of patients with IBS-D, we found percentage of primary BAs in fecal samples to provide an alternative to total fecal BAs in identification of patients with BAD or chronic diarrhea.

Indexed as

AdultBile Acids and SaltsChemical PhenomenaClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDiarrheaFecesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal TransitHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBile Acids and SaltsCDCAChenodeoxycholicCholic AcidDiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29902647
PMCPMC6291372
OpenAlexW2808535495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.