Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902592›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2018

Subsynaptic spatial organization as a regulator of synaptic strength and plasticity.

Haiwen Chen, Ai-Hui Tang, Thomas A Blanpied

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Presynaptic CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Dimeric gold nanoparticles enable multiplexed labeling in cryoelectron tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Presynaptic αNeuron · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Activity-dependent diffusion trapping of AMPA receptors as a key step for expression of early LTP.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Synapse-specific structural plasticity that protects and refines local circuits during LTP and LTD.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cell Adhesion Molecule Signaling at the Synapse: Beyond the Scaffold.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Structural and functional reorganization of inhibitory synapses by activity-dependent cleavage of neuroligin-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs. inhibitory neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haiwen ChenDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Ai-Hui TangDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Thomas A BlanpiedDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: tblanpied@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Internal Dynamics of the Postsynaptic DensityR37MH080046 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Thomas A Blanpied · 2020 to 2026
$5.0M
Internal Dynamics of the Postsynaptic DensityR01MH080046 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A · 2007 to 2019
$4.5M
CRCNS: Transmitter Release Site Organization in Plasticity and Disease at the NMJR01NS090644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A, LAGHAEI, ROZITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Multiparametric Biosensor Imaging in Brain SlicesR01MH111527 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A, MEREDITH, ANDREA L · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
Distinct regulation of evoked and spontaneous vesicle fusion site distributionsF30MH105111 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHEN, HAIWEN · 2015 to 2017
$103k
NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH105111NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080046NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111527NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH080046NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapses differ markedly in their performance, even amongst those on a single neuron. The mechanisms that drive this functional diversification are of great interest because they enable adaptive behaviors and are targets of pathology. Considerable effort has focused on elucidating mechanisms of plasticity that involve changes to presynaptic release probability and the number of postsynaptic receptors. However, recent work is clarifying that nanoscale organization of the proteins within glutamatergic synapses impacts synapse function. Specifically, active zone scaffold proteins form nanoclusters that define sites of neurotransmitter release, and these sites align transsynaptically with clustered postsynaptic receptors. These nanostructural characteristics raise numerous possibilities for how synaptic plasticity could be expressed.

Indexed as

AnimalsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPresynaptic TerminalsSynapsesSynaptic MembranesNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29902592
PMCPMC6295321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.