Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902585›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Elucidating relations between fMRI, ECoG, and EEG through a common natural stimulus.

Stefan Haufe, Paul DeGuzman, Simon Henin, Michael Arcaro, Christopher J Honey, Uri Hasson, Lucas C Parra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Thalamocortical orchestration of human theory of mind.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tumour-infiltrated cortex participates in large-scale cognitive circuits.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan HaufeTechnische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; City College New York, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: stefanhaufe@gmail.com.
Paul DeGuzmanNeuromatters LLC, New York, NY, USA.
Simon HeninNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael ArcaroHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher J HoneyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Uri HassonPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Lucas C ParraCity College New York, New York, NY, USA; Neuromatters LLC, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: parra@ccny.cuny.edu.

Funding

Speaker-listener coupling: a novel neural approach for assessing communicationDP1HD091948 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI · 2016 to 2021
$5.6M
Defining Neuronal Circuits and Cellular Processes Underlying Resting fMRI SignalsR01MH111439 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
Effects of direct-current stimulation on synaptic plasticityR01NS095123 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD091948NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111439NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human brain mapping relies heavily on fMRI, ECoG and EEG, which capture different physiological signals. Relationships between these signals have been established in the context of specific tasks or during resting state, often using spatially confined concurrent recordings in animals. But it is not certain whether these correlations generalize to other contexts relevant for human cognitive neuroscience. Here, we address the case of complex naturalistic stimuli and ask two basic questions. First, how reliable are the responses evoked by a naturalistic audio-visual stimulus in each of these imaging methods, and second, how similar are stimulus-related responses across methods? To this end, we investigated a wide range of brain regions and frequency bands. We presented the same movie clip twice to three different cohorts of subjects (N

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultBrainBrain MappingElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultECoGEEGfMRIInter-method correlationRepeat-reliability

Identifiers

PMID29902585
PMCPMC6063527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.