Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902203›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Rapid high resolution T1 mapping as a marker of brain development: Normative ranges in key regions of interest.

Sylvain Eminian, Steven David Hajdu, Reto Antoine Meuli, Philippe Maeder, Patric Hagmann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparison of test-retest repeatability of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In vivo TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvain EminianDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital (UNIL-CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Steven David HajduDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital (UNIL-CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Reto Antoine MeuliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital (UNIL-CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Philippe MaederDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital (UNIL-CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Patric HagmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital (UNIL-CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe studied in a clinical setting the age dependent T1 relaxation time as a marker of normal late brain maturation and compared it to conventional techniques, namely the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-two healthy subjects ranging from ages 1 year to 20 years were included in our study. T1 brain maps in which the intensity of each pixel corresponded to T1 relaxation times were generated based on MR imaging data acquired using a MP2RAGE sequence. During the same session, diffusion tensor imaging data was collected. T1 relaxation times and ADC in white matter and grey matter were measured in seven clinically relevant regions of interest and were correlated to subjects' age.

resultsIn the basal ganglia, there was a small, yet significant, decrease in T1 relaxation time (-0.45 ≤R≤-0.59, p<10-2) and ADC (-0.60≤R≤-0.65, p<10-4) as a function of age. In the frontal and parietal white matter, there was a significant decrease in T1 relaxation time (-0.62≤R≤-0.68, p<10-4) and ADC (-0.81≤R≤-0.85, p<10-4) as a function of age. T1 relaxation time changes in the corpus callosum and internal capsule were less relevant for this age range. There was no significant difference between the correlation of T1 relaxation time and ADC with respect to age (p-value = 0.39). The correlation between T1 relaxation and ADC is strong in the white matter but only moderate in basal ganglia over this age period.

conclusionsT1 relaxation time is a marker of brain maturation or myelination during late brain development. Between the age of 1 and 20 years, T1 relaxation time decreases as a function of age in the white matter and basal ganglia. The greatest changes occur in frontal and parietal white matter. These regions are known to mature in the final stage of development and are mainly composed of association circuits. Age-correlation is not significantly different between T1 relaxation time and ADC. Therefore, T1 relaxation time does not appear to be a superior marker of brain maturation than ADC but may be considered as complementary owing the intrinsic differences in bio-physical sensitivity. This work may serve as normative ranges in clinical imaging routines.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaBrain MappingFunctional NeuroimagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID29902203
PMCPMC6002025
OpenAlexW2807760927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.