Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29902133›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Immunogenicity and safety of a second dose of a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administered to healthy participants 7 years of age or older: A phase III, randomized study.

Remon Abu-Elyazeed, William Jennings, Randall Severance, Michael Noss, Adrian Caplanusi, Michael Povey, Ouzama Henry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02058563 (Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella Vaccine in Subjects Seven Years and Older), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02058563 phase3completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella Vaccine in Subjects Seven Years and Older (209762)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2014 to 2015Enrolled996ConditionsRubella, Mumps, MeaslesArmsPriorix®, Merck's M-M-R®II, Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Remon Abu-Elyazeeda GSK , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
William Jenningsb Radiant Research , San Antonio , TX , USA.
Randall Severancec Radiant Research , Chandler , AZ , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-5410
Michael Nossd Radiant Research , Cincinnati , OH , USA.
Adrian Caplanusie GSK , Wavre , Belgium.
Michael Poveye GSK , Wavre , Belgium.
Ouzama Henryf GSK , Rockville , MD , USA.
Radiant Research (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of vaccination programs against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) led to significant global reduction in morbidity and mortality from these diseases. The currently recommended MMR vaccination schedule in the United States of America comprises 2 vaccine doses typically administered at 12-15 months and 4-6 years, respectively. Considering recent outbreaks in the USA, catch-up vaccination with an additional dose of MMR vaccine could contribute to outbreak control and community protection. This phase III, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial (NCT02058563) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a dose of the MMR-RIT vaccine (Priorix, GSK) compared to MMR II vaccine (control; M-M-R II, Merck&Co Inc.) in ≥7-year-olds who had received ≥1 previous dose of MMR vaccine. We assessed anti-measles, anti-mumps, and anti-rubella antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs; primary endpoint) and seroresponse rates (SRRs) at day 42 post-vaccination. Solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity included 869 participants (MMR-RIT: N = 433; MMR II: N = 436). We observed anti-measles, anti-mumps, and anti-rubella antibody GMCs of 1790.2 mIU/mL, 113.5 EU/mL, and 76.1 IU/mL, respectively, and SRRs of 98.8%, 98.4%, and 99.5%, respectively, after a dose of MMR-RIT; non-inferiority compared to MMR II was demonstrated. Both vaccines showed comparable reactogenicity profiles; the most common solicited AEs were injection site redness and pain, and fever (MMR-RIT: 12.2%, 11.8%, and 3.0%; MMR II: 11.7%, 11.5%, and 5.2%, respectively). The dose of MMR-RIT induced robust immune responses that were not inferior to those of MMR II, and was well tolerated.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralChildFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImmunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryInjection Site ReactionMaleMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMumpsRubellaAntibodies, ViralMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccineimmunization scheduleimmunogenicitymeasles-mumps-rubella vaccinesafetysecond dose

Identifiers

PMID29902133
PMCPMC6314414
OpenAlexW2807997192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.