Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29901790›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Neurocognitive Profiles of Older Adults with Working-Memory Dysfunction.

Alireza Salami, Anna Rieckmann, Nina Karalija, Bárbara Avelar-Pereira, Micael Andersson, Anders Wåhlin, Goran Papenberg, Douglas D Garrett, Katrine Riklund, Martin Lövdén and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High long-term test-retest reliability for extrastriatalJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alireza SalamiAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna RieckmannUmeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Nina KaralijaUmeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bárbara Avelar-PereiraAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Micael AnderssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders WåhlinUmeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Goran PapenbergAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Douglas D GarrettCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Katrine RiklundUmeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Martin LövdénAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulman LindenbergerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Lars BäckmanAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars NybergUmeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals differ in how they perceive, remember, and think. There is evidence for the existence of distinct subgroups that differ in cognitive performance within the older population. However, it is less clear how individual differences in cognition in old age are linked to differences in brain-based measures. We used latent-profile analysis on n-back working-memory (WM) performance to identify subgroups in a large sample of older adults (n = 181; age = 64-68 years). Our analysis identified one larger normal subgroup with higher performance (n = 113; 63%), and a second smaller subgroup (n = 55; 31%) with lower performance. The low-performing subgroup showed weaker load-dependent BOLD modulation and lower connectivity within the fronto-parietal network (FPN) as well as between FPN and striatum during n-back, along with lower FPN connectivity at rest. This group also exhibited lower FPN structural integrity, lower frontal dopamine D2 binding potential, inferior performance on offline WM tests, and a trend-level genetic predisposition for lower dopamine-system efficiency. By contrast, this group exhibited relatively intact episodic memory and associated brain measures (i.e., hippocampal volume, structural, and functional connectivity within the default-mode network). Collectively, these data provide converging evidence for the existence of a group of older adults with impaired WM functioning characterized by reduced cortico-striatal coupling and aberrant cortico-cortical integrity within FPN.

Indexed as

AgedAgingBlood PressureBrainCognition DisordersDopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32FemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMemory DisordersMemory, Short-TermMental RecallMiddle AgedMutationDopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32OxygenRacloprideReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID29901790
PMCPMC5998950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.