ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018
Duality of Function: Activation for Meaningless Nonwords and Semantic Codes in the Same Brain Areas.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contributions of the multiple demand network to emergent and skilled reading.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- The Involvement of the Multiple Demand and Default Mode Networks in a Trial-by-Trial Cognitive Control.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A single case neuroimaging study of tickertape synesthesia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The role of the angular gyrus in semantic cognition: a synthesis of five functional neuroimaging studies.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- A predictive account of how novelty influences declarative memory.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2021Article
- Neural Components of Reading Revealed by Distributed and Symbolic Computational Models.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Distinct individual differences in default mode network connectivity relate to off-task thought and text memory during reading.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A robust dissociation among the language, multiple demand, and default mode networks: Evidence from inter-region correlations in effect size.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of the neural substrates of semantic (word meaning) processing have typically focused on semantic manipulations, with less consideration for potential differences in difficulty across conditions. While the idea that particular brain regions can support multiple functions is widely accepted, studies of specific cognitive domains rarely test for co-location with other functions. Here we start with standard univariate analyses comparing words to meaningless nonwords, replicating our recent finding that this contrast can activate task-positive regions for words, and default-mode regions in the putative semantic network for nonwords, pointing to difficulty effects. Critically, this was followed up with a multivariate analysis to test whether the same areas activated for meaningless nonwords contained semantic information sufficient to distinguish high- from low-imageability words. Indeed, this classification was performed reliably better than chance at 75% accuracy. This is compatible with two non-exclusive interpretations. Numerous areas in the default-mode network are task-negative in the sense of activating for less demanding conditions, and the same areas contain information supporting semantic cognition. Therefore, while areas of the default mode network have been hypothesized to support semantic cognition, we offer evidence that these areas can respond to both domain-general difficulty effects, and to specific aspects of semantics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.