Observational studyMedicine2018
Impact of nucleos(t)ide analog treatment on the development of malignancy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated whether nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) influences the risk of non-hepatocellular carcinoma (non-HCC) malignancies in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). A total of 9867 patients with CHB were followed up for ≥12 months for the occurrence of any type of malignancy between 1998 and 2013. Patients who received NA for ≥180 days were defined as the NA group. Propensity score matching produced the control (n = 2220) and NA groups (n = 2220) after adjustment for age, sex, and the presence of diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis. The National Health Insurance Service sample cohort dataset was used for external validation. Regarding non-HCC malignancies, only old age was an independent risk factor (>50 years; hazard ratio 3.17, 95% confidence interval 1.71-5.88, P < .001) in multivariate analysis. With regard to specific cancers such as thyroid, breast, lung, stomach, colorectal, pancreatobiliary, and hematologic malignancy, there was no difference of the incidence of each malignancy between the NA and control groups in both the hospital-based and external validation cohorts. NA treatment neither raises nor lowers the incidence of non-HCC malignancies in patients with CHB. Patients >50 years old are encouraged to undergo surveillance for malignancies similar to the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.