Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29901410›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2018

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Glycemic Variability, and Excessive Fetal Growth in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes.

Bethany M Mulla, Nudrat Noor, Tamarra James-Todd, Elvira Isganaitis, Tamara C Takoudes, Ashley Curran, Celestine E Warren, Karen E O'Brien, Florence M Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Time in Range in Pregnancy: Is There a Role?Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bethany M Mulla1 Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Nudrat Noor2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts.
Tamarra James-Todd2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts.
Elvira Isganaitis4 Joslin Diabetes Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Tamara C Takoudes1 Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Ashley Curran4 Joslin Diabetes Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Celestine E Warren4 Joslin Diabetes Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Karen E O'Brien1 Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Florence M Brown4 Joslin Diabetes Center , Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JEAN E. SCHAFFER · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Transgenic CoreP30DK057521 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FLOREZ, JOSE CARLOS · 2000 to 2019
$31.4M
Training Program in Environmental EpidemiologyT32ES007069 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LADEN, FRANCINE · 1985 to 2024
$13.9M
Phthalates, Gestational Diabetes, and Markers of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in WomenR01ES026166 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JAMES-TODD, TAMARRA M · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK057521NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026166NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine trimester-specific associations among glycemic variability, fetal growth, and birthweight in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes mellitus (Type 1 DM).

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study of 41 pregnant women with Type 1 DM, we used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to calculate glycemic variability (coefficient of variation of glucose) over a 7-day interval in each trimester. Clinical data, including fetal biometry, birthweight, and perinatal complications, were extracted from medical records.

resultsWomen maintained good glycemic control during pregnancy, with mean HbA1c in the first, second, and third trimester 6.5%, 6.1%, and 6.4%, respectively. Sixty-three percent of infants were large for gestational age (LGA). Estimated fetal weight percentile (EFW%ile) and abdominal circumference percentile (AC%ile) increased during pregnancy, consistent with accelerated prenatal growth. Correlations between trimester-specific glycemic variability and EFW, AC, and birthweight were not statistically significant. After maternal age adjustment, glycemic variability was not associated with birthweight for any trimester (adj. β for first trimester: -38.46, 95% CI: -98.58 to 21.66; adj. β for second trimester: -12.20, 95% CI: -51.47 to 27.06; adj. β for third trimester: -26.26, 95% CI: -79.52 to 27.00).

conclusionsThe occurrence of LGA remains very high in contemporary U.S. women with Type 1 DM, despite the use of CGM and overall good glycemic control. Neither HbA1c nor glycemic variability predicted fetal overgrowth or birthweight. Since LGA is a key driver of maternal and newborn complications in pregnancies with Type 1 DM, our data emphasize the importance of investigating both glucose-dependent and glucose-independent underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

AdultBirth WeightBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy in DiabeticsRetrospective StudiesBlood GlucoseBirthweightContinuous glucose monitoringFetal growthPregnancyType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29901410
PMCPMC6014051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.