Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29901134›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018

Identification and functional analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through bioinformatics methods.

Xiaoli Shao, Wangxiao Bao, Xiaoqin Hong, Huihua Jiang, Zhi Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the serum level of Lipocalin 2 in vitiligo.Archives of dermatological research · 2025
    Article
  2. Lipocalin-2 and Cerebral Stroke.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Neutralization of Lipocalin-2 Diminishes Stroke-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoli ShaoDepartment of Neurology, Chun'an First People's Hospital, Zhejiang People's Hospital Chun'an Branch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, P.R. China.
Wangxiao BaoDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Xiaoqin HongDepartment of Neurology, Chun'an First People's Hospital, Zhejiang People's Hospital Chun'an Branch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, P.R. China.
Huihua JiangDepartment of Neurology, Chun'an First People's Hospital, Zhejiang People's Hospital Chun'an Branch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, P.R. China.
Zhi YuDepartment of Neurology, Chun'an First People's Hospital, Zhejiang People's Hospital Chun'an Branch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, P.R. China.
Hangzhou First People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury results in detrimental complications. However, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the reperfusion stage. The aim of the present study was to identify a gene expression profile associated with cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. The GSE23160 dataset, which comprised data from sham control samples and post‑I/R injury brain tissues that were obtained using a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model at 2, 8 and 24 h post‑reperfusion, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the MCAO samples compared with controls were screened using the GEO2R web tool. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis for DEGs was performed using the online tool DAVID. Furthermore, a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database and Cytoscape software. In total, 32 DEGs at 2 h post‑reperfusion, 39 DEGs at 8 h post‑reperfusion and 91 DEGs at 24 h post‑reperfusion were identified, while 15 DEGs were common among all three groups. GO analysis revealed that the DEGs at all three time‑points were enriched in 'chemotaxis' and 'inflammatory response' terms, while KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that DEGs were significantly enriched in the 'chemokine signaling pathway'. Furthermore, following PPI network construction, Cxcl1 was identified as the only hub gene that was common among all three time‑points. In conclusion, the present study has demonstrated a global view of the potential molecular differences following cerebral I/R injury and may contribute to an improved understanding of the reperfusion stage, which may ultimately aid in the development of future clinical strategies.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBrain IschemiaComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle Cerebral ArteryMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein Interaction MappingReperfusion Injury

Identifiers

PMID29901134
PMCPMC6072188
OpenAlexW2805609101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.