Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29900948›Full record

ArticleArchives of rheumatology2016

Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Active Sacroiliitis and the Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values.

İclal Erdem Toslak, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz, Bülent Çekiç, Ayşe Eda Parlak, Hasan Fatih Çay, Sevim Yildiz, Bekir Erol, Deniz Özel, İlhan Sezer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

İclal Erdem ToslakDepartment of Radiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Meral Bilgilisoy FilizDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Bülent ÇekiçDepartment of Radiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Ayşe Eda ParlakDepartment of Radiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Hasan Fatih ÇayDepartment of Rheumatology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Sevim YildizDepartment of Radiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Bekir ErolDepartment of Radiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Deniz ÖzelDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty of Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
İlhan SezerDepartment of Rheumatology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAkdeniz University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging in detection of active sacroiliitis and compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized relative ADC (r-ADC) values by using vertebra and iliac wings as reference organs. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study included 56 patients (26 males, 30 females; mean age 37.7±10.1 years; range 18 to 66 years) with chronic back pain and without history of sacroiliitis who underwent magnetic resonance imaging. T2-weighted spectral presaturation with inversion recovery, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spectral presaturation with inversion recovery, and diffusion-weighted (b values: 0 and 600 s/mm2) images were obtained. All images were evaluated by two different radiologists for interobserver variability. All individuals were grouped in either mechanical low back pain (control group) or active sacroilitis (disease group) groups according to the presence or absence of MRI findings of active sacroilitis. ADC values of both surfaces were measured from normal and affected areas of joints. Also, ADC values of L5 vertebra and iliac wings were measured as reference organs to calculate r-ADC values.

resultsMean ADC and r-ADC values measured from lesions were significantly higher than that of normal appearing bone marrow areas in both patients with mechanical low back pain (n=17) and active sacroiliitis (n=39). Both ADC values and r-ADC values could differentiate active lesions from normal appearing bone marrow areas as well as contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. According to r-ADC values calculated with the L5 vertebra, unaffected portions of bone marrow areas in patients with sacroiliitis were normalized whereas r-ADC remained higher than normal in affected portions of the bones.

conclusionDiffusion-weighted imaging is a fast, sensitive magnetic resonance imaging sequence in detection of active sacroiliitis. It does not require contrast agent and can be safely used as an adjunct to conventional magnetic resonance images. r-ADC is also highly sensitive in detecting active sacroiliitis and may be used as an alternative to standard ADC measurements for the demonstration of inflammation. It helps eliminate individual bone marrow differences by using patients' own normal bone marrow measurements and increases diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Apparent diffusion coefficientdiffusion-weighted imagingmagnetic resonance imagingsacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID29900948
PMCPMC5827851
OpenAlexW2342980463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.