ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2018
The Use of Biosimilars in the Middle East: Review Article.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Multi-Switch Between Adalimumab Originator and Biosimilars: A Multicenter (SUSTAIN) Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of data on biosimilar prescription rates in rheumatology practice from a reference center in Turkey.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expert Consensus Recommendations on a Biosimilars Value Framework for the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilars in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewBiosimilars are of growing importance worldwide, and many leading countries are introducing them in their health care systems and are using them in many fields of medicine owing to their low price tags in comparison with the brands and to their similarities in terms of function and side effects. So we cannot look past them and continue to rely on the innovator drugs since many had proven their efficacies in number of researches and Trials, not to mention the burden that many diseases pose on the budgets of the third world countries making using a lower priced alternatives a much appealing choice for the decision makers. Many fields of medicine in Iraq have experiences with the use of these agents over the past few years like the use of vaccines, insulin, and Growth factors, but their use in rheumatic disorders is still unfamiliar in our country. Our main aim doing this Review was to go through the written data on use of biosimilars in nearby countries and regions and draw some information regarding Types used, Terms of use and market release, different related legislations- if any-, patient's selection criteria for their use in case of the presence of Brands, and examine the systems of successful pharmacovigilance, to guide us in producing our own guidance for perfect utilization of the newly arriving drugs.
resultsOverall, there were 21 separate articles in which the biosimilars were mentioned as integral parts of the reviews and main body of subject. Even these reports have deficiencies in descriptions of types of drugs, Prices, Patient selection strategies and Efficacy studies.
conclusionsThe biosimilar use is still considered a new encounter in the Middle Eastern areas, many countries have never had any experience with their use, With Very little published data in this regard. RECOMMENDATION: We advise the researchers and workers in this Region to pay more attention to documentation and publication of their works and experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.