Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29900185›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018

Portable impulse-radar detector for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Shinsuke Sasada, Norio Masumoto, Hang Song, Keiko Kajitani, Akiko Emi, Takayuki Kadoya, Koji Arihiro, Takamaro Kikkawa, Morihito Okada

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinsuke SasadaHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-869X
Norio MasumotoHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hang SongHiroshima University, Research Institute for Nanodevice and Bio Systems, Higashi-hiroshima, Japan.
Keiko KajitaniHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akiko EmiHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takayuki KadoyaHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Koji ArihiroHiroshima University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima Japan.
Takamaro KikkawaHiroshima University, Research Institute for Nanodevice and Bio Systems, Higashi-hiroshima, Japan.
Morihito OkadaHiroshima University, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microwave breast imaging is a painless and nonradiation method. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the detective capability and feasibility of a prototype of a portable breast cancer detector using a radar-based imaging system. Five patients with histologically confirmed breast cancers with a minimum diameter of 1 cm were enrolled in this study. The antenna array dome of the device was placed on the breast of the patient in a supine position for 15 min per single examination. The primary endpoint was a detection rate of breast cancers. The secondary endpoints were positional accuracy and adverse event. All five targeted breast tumors were detected and were visualized at the sites confirmed by other diagnostic modalities. Among five tumors, one was not detected via mammography because of heterogeneously dense breast and another was a microinvasive carcinoma of invasive tumor size 0.5 mm. No study-related adverse events occurred. The prototype of a portable breast cancer detector has sufficient detective capability, is safe for clinical use, and might detect an early stage breast cancer, such as noninvasive carcinoma. Future developments should focus on further decreasing the size of the machine and shortening inspection time.

Indexed as

breast cancerdetectabilitydome antennamicrowave imagingscreeningultrawideband radar

Identifiers

PMID29900185
PMCPMC5997971
OpenAlexW2808082390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.