Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29900105›Full record

ArticleEuPA open proteomics2016

Systemic amyloidoses and proteomics: The state of the art.

Francesca Lavatelli, Andrea di Fonzo, Giovanni Palladini, Giampaolo Merlini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuPA open proteomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FAST-IT:BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Proteomic analysis shows that the main constituent of subepidermal localised cutaneous amyloidosis is not galectin-7.Amyloid : the international journal of experimental and clinical investigation : the official journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca LavatelliAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center and Department of Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea di FonzoAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center and Department of Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni PalladiniAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center and Department of Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giampaolo MerliniAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center and Department of Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic amyloidoses are caused by misfolding-prone proteins that polymerize in tissues, causing organ dysfunction. Since proteins are etiological agents of these diseases, proteomics was soon recognized as a privileged instrument for their investigation. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has acquired a fundamental role in management of systemic amyloidoses, being now considered a gold standard approach for amyloid typing. In parallel, approaches for analyzing circulating amyloid precursors have been developed. Moreover, differential and functional proteomics hold promise for identifying novel biomarkers and clarifying disease mechanisms. This review discusses recent proteomics achievements in systemic amyloidoses, providing a perspective on its present and future applications.

Indexed as

Amyloidogenic proteinsAmyloidosisClinical proteomicsProteotoxicityTissue biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29900105
PMCPMC5988550
OpenAlexW2291546697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.