Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899982›Full record

Trial reportJournal of global health2018

Comparison of text messaging data collection vs face-to-face interviews for public health surveys: a cluster randomized crossover study of care-seeking for childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea in rural China.

Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Wei Wang, Qiong Wu, Ye Li, Robert W Scherpbier, Xiaozhen Du, Li Chen, Yanfeng Zhang, Josip Car, Igor Rudan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michelle Helena van VelthovenGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wei WangDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Qiong WuDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Ye LiDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Robert W ScherpbierHealth and Nutrition, UNICEF China, Beijing, China.
Xiaozhen DuDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Yanfeng ZhangDepartment of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Paediatrics, Beijing, China.
Josip CarGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Igor RudanCentre for Population Health Sciences and Global Health Academy, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare text messaging and face-to-face interviews to conduct a survey on childhood diarrhoea and pneumonia.

methodsCaregivers of young children able to send text messages in Zhao County in rural China were included in this crossover study. Villages (clusters) were randomized into two groups using the ratio 1:1.6 to account for an expected higher drop-out in group 2. In group 1, participants first completed the face-to-face and then text messaging survey; this order was reversed in group 2. We determined data equivalence of 17 questions that were answered by participants who were the same person in both surveys. For the text messaging survey, we assessed the overall and item response rate.

resultsWe included 1014 participants between 16 and 28 March 2013: 371 in 15 villages in group 1 and 643 in 27 villages in group 2. A total of 662 (65.3%) out of 1014 participants responded (first text message question) and a significantly higher proportion who did not respond were from rural areas (

conclusionsThis study shows that text messaging data collection produces data similar to data from face-to-face interviews in a middle-income setting, but the response rate was insufficient for use in public health surveys. Improving the response rate is important, because text message surveys could be of greater value in rural remote areas due to the cost-saving potential.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicText MessagingCaregiversChild, PreschoolChinaCluster AnalysisCross-Over StudiesDiarrheaFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePneumonia

Identifiers

PMID29899982
PMCPMC5997366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.