Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899971›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Rod and cone interactions in the retina.

Gordon Fain, Alapakkam P Sampath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Synaptotagmin-9 in mouse retina.Visual neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. SYNAPTOTAGMIN-9 IN MOUSE RETINA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Light Adaptation of Retinal Rod Bipolar Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mice LackingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Electroretinogram responses in myopia: a review.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  20. Retinal Toxicity Induced by Chemical Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon FainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7000, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-0342
Alapakkam P SampathDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7000, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have long known that rod and cone signals interact within the retina and can even contribute to color vision, but the extent of these influences has remained unclear. New results with more powerful methods of RNA expression profiling, specific cell labeling, and single-cell recording have provided greater clarity and are showing that rod and cone signals can mix at virtually every level of signal processing. These interactions influence the integration of retinal signals and make an important contribution to visual perception.

Indexed as

interactionphotoreceptorprocessingretina

Identifiers

PMID29899971
PMCPMC5968360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.