Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899520›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The containment of potential outbreaks triggered by imported Chikungunya cases in Italy: a cost utility epidemiological assessment of vector control measures.

F Trentini, P Poletti, F Baldacchino, A Drago, F Montarsi, G Capelli, A Rizzoli, R Rosà, C Rizzo, S Merler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F TrentiniDONDENA Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-7282
P PolettiDONDENA Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
F BaldacchinoDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
A DragoEntostudio, Ponte San Nicolò, Padova, Italy.
F MontarsiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Padova, Italy.
G CapelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Padova, Italy.
A RizzoliDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
R RosàDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
C RizzoDepartment of Infectious Disease, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy.
S MerlerCenter for Information Technology, Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento, Italy.
A MelegaroDONDENA Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy. alessia.melegaro@unibocconi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2221-8898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of infected travelers from endemic regions can trigger sustained autochthonous transmission of mosquito-borne pathogens in Europe. In 2007 a Chikungunya outbreak was observed in central Italy, mostly affecting two villages characterised by a high density of Aedes albopictus. The outbreak was mitigated through intervention strategies reducing the mosquito abundance. Ten years later, in 2017, sustained Chikungunya transmission was documented in both central and southern Italy. The proposed analysis identifies suitable reactive measures for the containment and mitigation of future epidemics by combining epidemiological modeling with a health economic approach, considering different arrival times of imported infections and possible delays in the notification of cases. Obtained estimates suggest that, if the first notification will occur in the middle of the mosquito breeding season, the combination of larvicides, adulticides and breeding sites removal represents the optimal strategy. In particular, we found that interventions implemented in 2007 were cost-effective, with about 3200 prevented cases, 1450 DALYs averted and €13.5 M saved. Moreover, larvicides are proven to be more cost beneficial in early summer and warmer seasons, while adulticides should be preferred in autumn and colder seasons. Our results provide useful indications supporting urgent decision-making of public health authorities in response to emerging mosquito-borne epidemics.

Indexed as

AnimalsChikungunya FeverCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease OutbreaksHumansInsecticidesItalyLarvaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPublic HealthSeasonsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID29899520
PMCPMC5998040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.