Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899510›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Eavesdropping and crosstalk between secreted quorum sensing peptide signals that regulate bacteriocin production in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Eric L Miller, Morten Kjos, Monica I Abrudan, Ian S Roberts, Jan-Willem Veening, Daniel E Rozen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From predicted bacteriocins to ecological function.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Overcoming toxicity: How nonantagonistic microbes manage to thrive in boom-and-bust environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Quorum Sensing inMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Pharmacology of T2R Mediated Host-Microbe Interactions.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bacterial Community Interactions During Chronic Respiratory Disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eric L MillerSchool of Biological Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Morten KjosMolecular Genetics Group, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9700 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4448-9082
Monica I AbrudanWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Ian S RobertsSchool of Biological Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. i.s.roberts@manchester.ac.uk.
Jan-Willem VeeningMolecular Genetics Group, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9700 AE, The Netherlands. Jan-Willem.Veening@unil.ch.
Daniel E RozenInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands. d.e.rozen@biology.leidenuniv.nl.
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/J006009/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M000281/1European Research Council 337399Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105610/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS), where bacteria secrete and respond to chemical signals to coordinate population-wide behaviors, has revealed that bacteria are highly social. Here, we investigate how diversity in QS signals and receptors can modify social interactions controlled by the QS system regulating bacteriocin secretion in Streptococcus pneumoniae, encoded by the blp operon (bacteriocin-like peptide). Analysis of 4096 pneumococcal genomes detected nine blp QS signals (BlpC) and five QS receptor groups (BlpH). Imperfect concordance between signals and receptors suggested widespread social interactions between cells, specifically eavesdropping (where cells respond to signals that they do not produce) and crosstalk (where cells produce signals that non-clones detect). This was confirmed in vitro by measuring the response of reporter strains containing six different blp QS receptors to cognate and non-cognate peptides. Assays between pneumococcal colonies grown adjacent to one another provided further evidence that crosstalk and eavesdropping occur at endogenous levels of signal secretion. Finally, simulations of QS strains producing bacteriocins revealed that eavesdropping can be evolutionarily beneficial even when the affinity for non-cognate signals is very weak. Our results highlight that social interactions can mediate intraspecific competition among bacteria and reveal that competitive interactions can be modified by polymorphic QS systems.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBacteriocinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialOperonQuorum SensingSignal TransductionStreptococcus pneumoniaeBacterial ProteinsBacteriocins

Identifiers

PMID29899510
PMCPMC6155019
OpenAlexW2808611921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.