Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899373›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018

Isochromosome 21q is overrepresented among false-negative cell-free DNA prenatal screening results involving Down syndrome.

Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam, Lieve Page-Christiaens, Nicola Flowers, Michael D Bonifacio, Katie M Battese Ellis, Ida Vogel, Else Marie Vestergaard, Javier Miguelez, Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho, Erik A Sistermans and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A rareArchive of clinical cases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA Hyperstructure.ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Karin Huijsdens-van AmsterdamDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieve Page-ChristiaensIllumina, Inc. San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicola FlowersVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael D BonifacioGenea, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Katie M Battese EllisGenea, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ida VogelDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Else Marie VestergaardDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Javier MiguelezFleury Medicina & Saude, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mario Henrique Burlacchini de CarvalhoFleury Medicina & Saude, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Erik A SistermansDepartment of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-4563
Mark D PertileVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. mark.pertile@vcgs.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8363-2879
Aarhus University Hospital · DKFleury S.A. (Brazil) · BRAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLIllumina (United States) · USThe University of Melbourne · AUVictorian Clinical Genetics Services · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

False-negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results involving Down syndrome are rare, but have high clinical impact on patients and their healthcare providers. Understanding the biology behind these results may allow for improved diagnostic follow-up and counseling. In 5 different centers offering cfDNA prenatal screening, 9 false-negative results were documented in 646 confirmed cases of trisomy 21; a false-negative rate of 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7-2.6). False-negative results included 4 cases of classical trisomy 21 and 5 cases with a de novo 21q;21q rearrangement. Two out of five rearrangements had molecular studies and were confirmed as isochromosomes. When combined with reports from the cfDNA screening literature, 8 out of 29 (28%) Down syndrome cases with a false-negative "non-invasive prenatal test" (NIPT) were associated with a 21q;21q rearrangement, compared with 2% reported in live born children with Down syndrome. In our laboratory series, evidence for placental or fetal mosaicism was present in 3 out of 3 true-positive cases involving a 21q;21q rearrangement and was confirmed in one false-negative case where placental material was available for study. Isochromosome 21q rearrangements are thus overrepresented among false-negative cfDNA screening results involving Down syndrome. Postzygotic isochromosome formation leading to placental mosaicism provides a biological cause for the increased prevalence of these rearrangements among false-negative cases. For clinical practice, a low trisomic fraction (z-score or equivalent measure) relative to the fetal fraction suggests placental mosaicism. Care should be taken as these cases may not reflect confined placental mosaicism, but rather full trisomy in the presence of a placenta containing normal cells.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Down SyndromeFemaleHumansIsochromosomesKaryotypingMosaicismPlacentaPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID29899373
PMCPMC6138668
OpenAlexW2808167537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.