Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29899222›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Trimester-Specific Dietary Intakes in a Sample of French-Canadian Pregnant Women in Comparison with National Nutritional Guidelines.

Claudia Savard, Simone Lemieux, S John Weisnagel, Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson, Claudia Gagnon, Julie Robitaille, Anne-Sophie Morisset

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Dietary Supplement Use during Pregnancy: Perceptions versus Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia SavardSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada. claudia.savard.4@ulaval.ca.
Simone LemieuxSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada. simone.lemieux@fsaa.ulaval.ca.
S John WeisnagelEndocrinology and Nephrology Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada. john.weisnagel@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Bénédicte Fontaine-BissonSchool of Nutrition Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada. bfontain@uottawa.ca.
Claudia GagnonEndocrinology and Nephrology Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada. claudia.gagnon@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Julie RobitailleSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada. julie.robitaille@fsaa.ulaval.ca.
Anne-Sophie MorissetSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada. anne-sophie.morisset@fsaa.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CAInstitut du Savoir Montfort · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet during pregnancy greatly impacts health outcomes. This study aims to measure changes in dietary intakes throughout trimesters and to assess pregnant women’s dietary intakes in comparison with current Canadian nutritional recommendations. Seventy-nine pregnant women were recruited and completed, within each trimester, three Web-based 24-h dietary recalls and one Web questionnaire on supplement use. Dietary intakes from food, with and without supplements, were compared to nutritional recommendations throughout pregnancy. Energy and macronutrient intakes remained stable throughout pregnancy. A majority of women exceeded their energy and protein requirements in the first trimester, and fat intakes as a percentage of energy intakes were above recommendations for more than half of the women in all trimesters. Supplement use increased dietary intakes of most vitamins and minerals, but 20% of women still had inadequate total vitamin D intakes and most women had excessive folic acid intakes. This study showed that pregnant women did not increase their energy intakes throughout pregnancy as recommended. Furthermore, although prenatal supplementation reduces the risk of inadequate intake for most micronutrients, there is still a risk of excessive folic acid and insufficient vitamin D intake, which needs further investigation.

Indexed as

DietDietary SupplementsMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusPregnancy TrimestersRecommended Dietary AllowancesAdultDietary FatsDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeFemaleFolic AcidHumansNutrition AssessmentNutrition SurveysPregnancyDietary FatsDietary ProteinsFolic AcidVitamin Ddietary intakesdietary reference intakes (DRIs)energy intakespregnancysupplements

Identifiers

PMID29899222
PMCPMC6024697
OpenAlexW2807748811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.