ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018
How ants move: individual and collective scaling properties.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridge, Reverse Bridge, and Their Control.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Why collective behaviours self-organize to criticality: a primer on information-theoretic and thermodynamic utility measures.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Beehive scale-free emergent dynamics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Beehive scale-free emergent dynamics.ArXiv · 2023Article
- Ants combine systematic meandering and correlated random walks when searching for unknown resources.iScience · 2023Article
- Breakdown of Scaling and Friction Weakening in Intermittent Granular Flow.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The motion of social insects is often used as a paradigmatic example of complex adaptive dynamics arising from decentralized individual behaviour. In this paper, we revisit the topic of the ruling laws behind the burst of activity in ants. The analysis, done over previously reported data, reconsiders the causation arrows, proposed at individual level, not finding any link between the duration of the ants' activity and their moving speed. Secondly, synthetic trajectories created from steps of different ants demonstrate that a Markov process can explain the previously reported speed shape profile. Finally, we show that as more ants enter the nest, the faster they move, which implies a collective property. Overall, these results provide a mechanistic explanation for the reported behavioural laws, and suggest us a formal way to further study the collective properties in these scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.