ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018
The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 281 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Filtration-Based SERS With In Situ Gold Growth in Bacterial Microenvironment for Rapid Detection of Low-Level Bacteria.Small methods · 2026Article
- Probing the limits of genetic recoding using multi-omics-guided evolution.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Integrating Vibrio natriegens for Photon Manipulation in Living Lighting Devices.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Generative approaches to kinetic parameter inference in metabolic networks via latent space exploration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Forecasting Multitrait Resistance Evolution under Antibiotic Stress.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Tracking the early spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplasma multiplication within its leafhopper vector.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- Modulating microbial intake helps to maintain the gut microbiome diversity.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Dynamics of genetic circuits in Pseudomonas protegens.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of bacterial heterogeneity on bacteriophage population dynamics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetically Modified Microorganisms: Risks and Regulatory Considerations for Human and Environmental Health.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Can the Timing of the Origin of Life Be Inferred from Trends in the Growth of Organismal Complexity?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimal Multi-Drug Therapies for Antimicrobial Resistance with Horizontal Transfer.Journal of optimization theory and applications · 2026Article
- Growth of candidate phyla radiation bacteria in groundwater incubations reveals widespread adaptations to oxic conditions.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Article
- Transition ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Survival mechanism of pancreatic tumor bacteria and their ability to metabolize chemotherapy drugs.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Multiplexed PCR to measureApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- A virulent phage vB_VpaP_R28Z infecting Vibrio parahaemolyticus with potential for therapeutic application.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Generation time varies widely across organisms and is an important factor in the life cycle, life history and evolution of organisms. Although the doubling time (DT) has been estimated for many bacteria in the laboratory, it is nearly impossible to directly measure it in the natural environment. However, an estimate can be obtained by measuring the rate at which bacteria accumulate mutations per year in the wild and the rate at which they mutate per generation in the laboratory. If we assume the mutation rate per generation is the same in the wild and in the laboratory, and that all mutations in the wild are neutral, an assumption that we show is not very important, then an estimate of the DT can be obtained by dividing the latter by the former. We estimate the DT for five species of bacteria for which we have both an accumulation and a mutation rate estimate. We also infer the distribution of DTs across all bacteria from the distribution of the accumulation and mutation rates. Both analyses suggest that DTs for bacteria in the wild are substantially greater than those in the laboratory, that they vary by orders of magnitude between different species of bacteria and that a substantial fraction of bacteria double very slowly in the wild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.