ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018
Sensitivity of Single-Molecule Array Assays for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Comparison to Conventional Laboratory Testing Algorithms.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory Diagnostic Methods forAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Determination of the performance of a novel diagnostic test forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024Review
- Emerging Diagnostics inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Clostridioides difficile toxin is infrequently detected in inflammatory bowel disease and does not associate with clinical outcomes.Gut pathogens · 2022Article
- A point-prevalence study on community and inpatientEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022Article
- Rapid-format recombinant antibody-based methods for the diagnosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Testing for Higher Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Review
- Consolidation of Clinical Microbiology Laboratories and Introduction of Transformative Technologies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis ofClinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020Review
- High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Point-of-Need DNA Testing for Detection of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines recommend the use of an algorithm for the laboratory diagnosis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.