Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898980›Full record

ArticlemSphere2018

Two Distinct Approaches for CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Cryptococcus neoformans and Related Species.

Ping Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biolistic Transformation of Cryptococcus neoformans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Combating increased antifungal drug resistance inActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Updates inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Genetic Transformation inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ping WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA pwang@lsuhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-2779
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Genome editing in Rhizopus delemar using using CRISPR-Cas systemsR21AI121451 · NIAID · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI WANG, PING · 2016 to 2017
$397k
Genome Engineering of Cryptococcus Neoformans using CRISPR-Cas SystemR03AI121460 · NIAID · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI WANG, PING · 2016 to 2017
$146k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI121460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CryptococcusElectroporationEndonucleasesGene EditingGenetics, MicrobialGenetic VectorsPlasmidsRecombination, GeneticBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesGβ-like/RACK1 proteinhomologous recombination-mediated gene editingpCnCas9:U6-gRNAribonucleoprotein complex

Identifiers

PMID29898980
PMCPMC6001613
OpenAlexW2807813664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.