Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898948›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018

Geographic variation in FP and GP scope of practice in Ontario: Comparative provincial study.

Elizabeth F Wenghofer, Sophia M Kam, Patrick E Timony, Roger Strasser, Jessica Sutinen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What competencies do European general practice trainees value the most? A prioritisation exercise using a Delphi-informed approach.Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Focused practice in family medicine: Quantitative study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth F WenghoferFull Professor and Director in the School of Rural and Northern Health and the Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ont. ewenghofer@laurentian.ca.
Sophia M KamDoctoral candidate in the School of Rural and Northern Health at Laurentian University.
Patrick E TimonyDoctoral candidate in the School of Rural and Northern Health and a research associate in the Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research at Laurentian University.
Roger StrasserDean and Chief Executive Officer of the Northern Ontario School of Medicine at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay and Laurentian University in Sudbury.
Jessica SutinenFormer research assistant at the Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research at Laurentian University.
Laurentian University · CADepartment of Agriculture and Rural Development · GBNOSM University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe and compare the scope of practice (SoP) of GPs and FPs between the rural northern, rural southern, urban northern, and urban southern regions of Ontario.

designCross-sectional retrospective analysis of the 2013 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario official register and annual membership renewal survey data.

settingOntario.

participantsAll independently practising GPs and FPs with a primary practice address in Ontario.

main outcome measuresFor each of the 4 regions, we determined the distribution of GPs and FPs, the mean number of hours worked per week, the mean number of clinical activities reported, the proportion of GPs and FPs reporting specific clinical activities, and the proportion of time dedicated to each activity.

resultsThe rural north has 2.4% of the province's GPs and FPs, who on average report working more hours per week (a total of 50.82 hours a week) than practitioners in all other regions do. Rural northern and rural southern GPs and FPs report participating in more types of clinical activities than their urban counterparts do. The types of clinical activities reported vary across regions. For example, 13.3% of GPs and FPs in the urban south reported that emergency medicine was an aspect of their clinical activities, compared with 57.5% in the rural north. Urban GPs and FPs engage in fewer clinical activities and thus spend proportionately more time on each clinical activity than rural GPs and FPs do, indicating that clinical practice concentration and narrower SoP is more common in urban practices.

conclusionThe SoP for GPs and FPs is not uniform across Ontario. Rural physicians work more hours and engage in a broader spectrum of clinical activities. Clinical activity variation was found across all practice locations, indicating that SoP is driven by patient and community needs, which vary from region to region. Our findings are relevant for rural and northern policy and program development in medical education, continuing professional development, and physician recruitment and retention.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleGeneral PracticeGeographyHumansMaleOntarioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesRural Health ServicesUrban Health Services

Identifiers

PMID29898948
PMCPMC5999252
OpenAlexW2809562150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.