Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898905›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2018

Tuberculosis elimination: where are we now?

Alberto Matteelli, Adrian Rendon, Simon Tiberi, Seif Al-Abri, Constantia Voniatis, Anna Cristina C Carvalho, Rosella Centis, Lia D'Ambrosio, Dina Visca, Antonio Spanevello and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Alberto MatteelliUniversity Dept of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for TB/HIV co-infection and for TB elimination, University of Brescia and Brescia Spedali Civili General Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Adrian RendonCentro de Investigación, Prevención y Tratamiento de Infecciones Respiratorias, Hospital Universitario de Monterrey, Monterrey, México.
Simon TiberiDivision of Infection, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Seif Al-AbriMinistry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
Constantia VoniatisClinical Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Anna Cristina C CarvalhoLaboratory of Innovations in Therapies, Education and Bioproducts (LITEB), Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC), FioCruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rosella CentisWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-3598
Lia D'AmbrosioWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-5777
Dina ViscaPneumology Dept, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy.
Antonio SpanevelloPneumology Dept, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy.
Giovanni Battista MiglioriWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-574X
World Health Organization - Italy · ITBarts Health NHS Trust · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez · MXIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITMinistry of Health · OMMinistry of Health · CYUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) still represents a major public health issue in spite of the significant impact of the efforts made by the World Health Organization (WHO) and partners to improve its control. In 2014 WHO launched a new global strategy (End TB) with a vision of a world free of TB, and a 2035 goal of TB elimination (defined as less than one incident case per million). The aim of this article is to summarise the theoretical bases of the End TB Strategy and to analyse progresses and persistent obstacles on the way to TB elimination.The evolution of the WHO recommended strategies of TB control (Directly Observed Therapy, Short Course (DOTS), Stop TB and End TB) are described and the concept of TB elimination is discussed. Furthermore, the eight core activities recently proposed by WHO as the milestones to achieve TB elimination are discussed in detail. Finally, the recently published experiences of Cyprus and Oman on their way towards TB elimination are described, together with the regional experience of Latin America.New prevention, diagnostic and treatment tools are also necessary to increase the speed of the present TB incidence decline.

Indexed as

Global HealthAntitubercular AgentsBacteriological TechniquesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDirectly Observed TherapyDisease EradicationEarly DiagnosisHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceSocioeconomic FactorsTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesAntitubercular AgentsTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29898905
PMCPMC9488456
OpenAlexW2808138805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.