Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898897›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2018

Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.

Bénédicte Michel, Anurag K Sinha, David R F Leach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. mLife · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. RecBCD enzyme: mechanistic insights from mutants of a complex helicase-nuclease.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  19. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bénédicte MichelGenome Biology Department, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France benedicte.michel@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr D.Leach@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3203-3275
Anurag K SinhaDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David R F LeachInstitute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom benedicte.michel@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr D.Leach@ed.ac.uk.
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M019160/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all organisms, replication impairments are an important source of genome rearrangements, mainly because of the formation of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends at inactivated replication forks. Three reactions for the formation of dsDNA ends at replication forks were originally described for

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedChromosomes, BacterialDNADNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRecombination, GeneticDNADNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli Proteinschromosome terminusdouble-strand breakPriARecARecBCRecBCDRecGrecombinationreplication fork reversalreplication restartRuvAB

Identifiers

PMID29898897
PMCPMC6094043
OpenAlexW2807924995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.